The burns kept trees from taking over.    

I do believe that one can build soil in a sustainable way (ie. not by importing feed, minerals, or chemicals). Infact, that's my goal on my (future) farm, but I don't believe for a minute that its going to be easy...or all that profitable. Lets hope I'm wrong.

It can be done.   www.soilfoodweb.com   The works of Albert Howard, and the Rodale institute can give you pointers.    Don't forget the rock dust.  (you can make the rock dust yourself BTW)

It'll take years, and mostlikely someone will buy your land in the future and 'suck' all the soil value back outta it, but hey, you'll be dead.

"The burns kept trees from taking over."

No they didn't. I've addressed this misconception in a comment below.

You've outlined much of the reading that has lead me to sustainable farming. Anybody else who would like to start, or transition, to sustainable farming would be well-advised to check out some of this material. ATTRA (http://attra.org) is also a good source of information.

People might like to read up on slash-and-burn farming. People in the Amazon Basin have been practicing this method for thousands of years. It's a quick way to clear a field and returns nutrients from the plant matter faster than if left to rot naturally.

The problem? Nutrients in tropical soils are scarce. The input from burning doesn't last long and the farmer must clear another section of forest (every three years or so if I remember my class notes correctly). Since the forest takes longer to recover than three years, each farmer needs a significant amount of fallow land. The method still works well as long as population density is very low and the farmer is willing to sustain back-breaking amounts of labour.