Is it possible that President Hu's response will be "You and what army?" More seriously, I think that this points out what most of us may already be doing, or should be doing: exchanging paper dollars for long term oil and gas contracts, such as by buying stock in oil companies and royalty trusts. I am somewhat amazed that there has not been more discussion on the various boards I visit: it seems to me to be much cheaper to "buy" future oil and gas through the stock market, than to "save" oil and gas by investing in solar panels, etc.
Having followed that strategy for the past three years, since I became aware of peak oil, I can say that I am much better prepared to face the future than if I had invested my money in rural land, etc.
I think we all recognize that oil and gas are still relatively cheap now, and that Wall Street does not appropriately value oil and gas. North American oil and gas companies are still being sold as if oil were $45/barrel, not $70 and climbing. I wish that I had the access to the oil industry the way West Texas did, but anybody can open an account at Vanguard, for example, and buy oil and gas on the cheap, just like China is doing.
As a self-interested human as well as a member of the human community, I would engage in both buying oil as you said (I bought into USO yesterday myself) as well as engaging in practices that will lower your energy use. Just don't forget that you're engaging in your share of "the tragedy of the commons" when buying up all that oil.
Two advantages to investing in royalty trusts:(1) I have been able to pay for insulation, efficient lighting and a Prius, and (2) I have been able to go "carbon neutral" not only for my household, but for my extended family and for the consequences of all of my oil and gas investments. It was a shock to see how much my share of the Canadian oil sands was impacting GHG, but it felt good to buy the offsets.
olepossom -

While buying stock in oil companies and royalty trusts may improve your future net worth, just keep in mind that you can't heat your home or run your car on stock certificates.  You may have more money to buy the more expensive oil or gas, but in a really serious energy shortage possibly combined with social chaos you are not going to be much better off than anyone else.

I think it is a mistake to look at this whole Peak Oil subject purely in financial terms.

(Correction: If you have a wood stove, you CAN heat your home with stock certificates, but you better have an awful lot of them! )

Excellent point, joule.  Alternative energy is a (highly under-rated) form of civil defense.
They understood that in WWII, they were called 'victory gardens' for a reason, walking and riding bicycles was extolled as patriotic, and substitutes for things were used to great acclaim - WWII is where margerine came into its own (yuk!).

There was not so much of an alternate fuel push because the US was the world's swing producer of oil and most of the carpooling and gas rationing was to save on TIRES rather than gas, so using hemp for fuel etc would have had people driving more and using up their tires.

Yes.

In line with westexas advise, to live you need water, food shelter and clothes. Stock certificates will work to light your wood stove.