116 comments on A gentle cough for the Washington Post
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
116 comments on A gentle cough for the Washington Post
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I disagree with this. One can higher living standards.
One can have REALLY good software, very high capacity & speed broadband, great tasting food, live in an interesting and beautiful neighborhood, have 5 places to buy food within 6 blocks, a couple of world class restaurants nearby and more within a streetcar ride (streetcars just a couple of blocks away). Great music easily accessible, interesting people (and architecture) all around.
All for, say, 6 gallons/month and an average of 350 kWh/month in direct consumption. Most goods can be brought by energy efficient rail and water trabsportation.
I live a higher quality of life than my two brothers, for 1/10th the energy consumed.
But I agree that people can live very happily in a quite low-energy environment. Personal happiness is a diffeent question. But, unfortunately, we know that a sudden drop in energy use and the economic and social disruption connected with it do make people quite unhappy. The problem is mostly the change, not the level, as long as your most basic needs are satisfied.
I noted this with my remark that rail (we have six Class I railroads*) and water (ocean and barge) can bring all essentials to us in energy efficient ways. How much and how fast modal shift occurs is still an open question.
Yes, there is the larger question as well for all the "indirect" energy use.
* Union Pacific, CSX, Burlington Northern-Santa Fe, Norfolk-Southern, Canadian National, Kansas City Southern
It will be harder to live in the next 10 years mainly because most of the people have been accustomated to low endosomatic enerfy use. Growing a garden will be applied first, then permaculture will probably get on rapidly.
Being a Cisco professional (among many other things) I can tell you that powering the whole internet infrastructure takes lot of energy. Even Google complained about the enery cost of computing last summer. In order to compute all the stuff they do, they need lots of power. For that power, the liquid fossil fuels needs to be up and running.
You will probably be able to live good, but you will have to do more that just surfing on the web in order to do so.
Wolfric, I am sure Alan is very aware of the fossil fuels needed to bring food to the stores. Have you read any of his posts? He is one of the best contributors to TOD...
This is your standard of a quality life. I work three weeks on three off and enjoy traveling all over the place. I would go crazy staying in one place for an extended period of time.
Your examples only apply to a few metro areas. Light rail will not satisfy the transportation demands of the countryside. So with limited transportation someone in a small town will not have the music and architecture etc. Fine restaurants are great but how much will a shrimp dinner cost in Idaho five years after peak?
Everyone can't live in NOLA. (but everyone should visit at least once)
I felt the same way when I lived in Baton Rouge and Houston. However, New Orleans has enough local diversity and distinct flavors to keep me remarkably satisfied for variety.
> Your examples only apply to a few metro areas.
Unfortunately true. When in Phoenix, I sometimes wonder what "could have been". Perhaps a series of medium size towns (~50,000) to large cities (~750,000) arranged in a ring of nodes on the Valley floor with rail connections in between and some "commercial only roads" between. Each community set up on walkable, people orientated basis around each intercity rail node and an urban circulator rail system. Human scale, multistory housing for most with community green space (yes irrigated, but limited). Bicycles quite common, Golf carts more common than automobiles for movement within the local city. Farm land and undeveloped desert outside each city or town, seperating each one. Far less pollution than today. Each city or town could have somewhat different demographics and architecture and resulting individual character.
In Europe, light rail does serve many small towns, but in areas with higher density than some parts of the US. I could see service between Baton Rouge and New Orleans that served La Place and Gonzales and West Bank service that services a half dozen cities.
We will be VERY past Peak Oil before the US does something comparable.
> Everyone can't live in NOLA
And many want no one to live here. Destroy the living example of an American alternative.
> (but everyone should visit at least once)
Yes, we need the money ! :-) And one can learn as well "what could be" if one wanders outside Bourbon Street and the Convention Center.