231 comments on E85: Spinning Our Wheels
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
231 comments on E85: Spinning Our Wheels
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Excellent post as always.
Can I suggest we all copy an past this as an email to our legislators?
Matt
though i would suspect they have at least one good anti-spam filter that also weeds out most of those emails.
it would be better if you take this, print it out and snail mail it to your reps and have everyone you know do the same.
I performed a very similar, back of the napkin analysis on the same issue years ago (right after the 2002 USDA study came out), and came to very much the same conclusions (as you probably have been able to tell).
Simple mathematics, combined with published and documented research, leads us to this inescapible and quite honestly, common sense conclusion: Ethanol from corn as a replacement for gasoline is a joke. A cruel one, at that.
This push for "E85, everywhere!" is yet another smokescreen for a poorly though out plan to put tax dollars in the pockets of ADM and Cargill, sell more obsolete, heavy, and inefficient GM made vehicles, and raise food prices.
Westtexas's 'Iron Triangle', of course, supports the notion completely. Anything to distract us, the unthinking populace, from the real and inconvienent problems at hand.
RR
Kudos to you: a Cassandra of E85 Truth!
A few basic questions that should be put to all Pres. candidates are:
1. Since we have past the peak in food output and drastically reduced food aid to starving children worldwide, shouldn't we be rebuilding future American grain inventories here at home versus burning it in our E85 SUVs?
http://www.fas.usda.gov/excredits/FoodAid/FoodAid101_files/frame.htm
- Since milgov policy is to concentrate the E85 benefits and diffuse the costs to the taxpayer: what is your projected E85 subsidy tipping point when postPeak American starvation outweighs the E85 elite profits?
- How fast does our switching to ERoEI-weak E85 'energy slaves' accelerate the growth of future American manual labor 'wage slaves'; i.e. Westexas's college grads and illegals laboring together in the farm fields?
- If global warming and acquifer depletion result in American Dustbowl conditions will you volunteer yourself and your offspring to a daily regimen of pedaling a bicycle-powered water pump?
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/experimental/edb/lbfinal.gifBob Shaw in Phx,AZ Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Here's something I've been thinking about a lot in a post-peak world:
I have a 120-acre farm/ranch that could eventually be broken up into smaller micro-farms for families -- say 10 or 15 acres. I've even considered the idea of selling "turn-key permaculture farmettes."
But would it be better keep the land in one piece and hire people to help work it when conventional fuel becomes too expensive.
I recognize the possibility the milgov will simply sieze the farm and do what they want with it, but I'm trying to be an agro-optimist about this.
What would you do?
My preference would be a leaving a small sustenance farm for myself and putting the rest in wildlife refuge, but I have an ethical quandary about providing for wildlife while people starve.
I am a life-long city boy with no farming experience--so this advice is probably wrong--you would know better than I.
Hiring help gives you greater control, but they will abandon you when times get tough. Selling farmettes offers a chance for better security, community, defensibility, and teamwork because your neighbors will be heavily invested and committed to the land.
Evaluating true sustainability where you include the surrounding wildlife and their habitat requirements is beyond my ability, perhaps some US Parks & Wildlife Game Management textbooks would be a good starting resource. I would not feel guilty about your ethical quandary trying to save other lifeforms [Noah's Ark]-- it takes all life to make the world go round.
The Overshoot condition will bring plenty of starving people to loot your farm, no matter if you subdivide or not--that is not your fault. Your job is to save the very last tomato, potato, rutabaga, and parsnip if you can. Any deer, elk, pine tree and birch that you helped to grow will have to take its chances at that time, but if you and your neighbors have created sufficient quantities--some will escape to survive.
My advice is to spread the Peakoil Outreach to your existing neighbors, hopefully building a small core into an ever larger biosolar habitat that can generate sufficient surplus real wealth. WTSHTF, hopefully your group can hire a company of real crack snipers from Blackwater Security to patrol the perimeter. This should work fine as long as the meals hold out-- recall my earlier post. You and your farming neighbors may have to work twice as hard as these Earthmarines, but you won't have to kill anybody, and you and your neighbors will be the ones getting a decent night's rest.
Soldiers make very poor farmers, see my Zimbabwe post. They will be thrilled if you feed them. Dogs of War viciously defend their food bowls. I think this symbiosis seems logical as the best way to defend 'land lifeboats'. My two cents--your mileage may vary.
John Robb, former Special Forces member, now of Global Guerrilla blog fame, can probably elaborate further or soundly refute what I am saying is the best course. I suggest you email him:
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/about.html
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Thxs for responding. I never said this would be easy. Yes, it is quite likely that the Earthmarines will become the eventual feudal masters, but they should be smart enough to realize that it will be counter-productive to kill the hand that feeds them. Far better to maintain an outward defensive focus until the invasive threat subsides.
As Ted Koppel speculates: [see LATOC news & upates for this essential article] it is far more likely that large biosolar habitats will arise from the profit-oriented drive of international consortiums meeting detritus entropy. The '3 Days of the Condor' scenario run to its max. profit REAL BIOSOLAR WEALTH conclusion. Consider: biosolar 'Monsantoland', 'GazPromisedLand', 'XOMobiland', etc as inevitable results.
The overriding concern is if the full-on nuclear gift exchange can be avoided-- a big IF-- but corporate powers, which transcend geographic borders, will do their best to prevent this because noone profits.
In my mind, it is easy to forsee corporate IPOs where the farmers pledge their land & labor in exchange for inclusion into the creation of large and distinct corporate biosolar habitats whereby the corps' accumulated wealth is used to optimize and expand sustainability. 'Cargilland', for example, could quickly arise in the American Heartland to stem the massive throngs leaving the denuded Southwest, similar to the Gretna sheriffs preventing Nawlins residents from crossing the freeway bridge. It is only logical, as the first order of business, is to prevent the swamping of a 'land lifeboat'. Corp entities can finance and equip Earthmarines far longer than the disassociated and disorganized detritovores caught in entropic decline.
Once a distinct habitat is created, a similar project to Zimbabwe's "Taking out the Trash" can be commenced to outsource any non-additive economic drags. Sad. =(
But I would prefer wholesale mitigation and cooperation to all of the above. Hopefully an astounding breakthrough will come out of the upcoming G8 Energy Security conference. Time will tell.
Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
? An odd conclusion. How good are lawyers, engineers, professors and bloggers?
Blackwater shooters get paid 750$ a day. If one of these guys wants your food they have the weapons and will to do it. You'd be better of marrying your daughters to guys like this and hoping they can farm.
ask your Dr. about lithium
Then they try it themselves, not realizing the material isn't really funny, and wonder why no one's laughing but themselves.
I suspect I'm not alone. Oilrig Medic is himself a blogger and ex-soldier. =P
Historically speaking (Carthage, Rome, Greek city states, etc), mercenaries are pretty lousy soldiers, except under certain circumstances. Lack of motivation (beyond personal profit) being key.
My point about engineers/bloggers/lawyers etc is very few of us know how to farm and those of us that do have never had to its has only been supplemental.
If my lithium comment offended anyone I apologize. I was joking that the Earthmarine/detrivore concept is sci-fi delusional and obscures an otherwise positive message.
But I suspect most of us may get to try our hand at it at some point in the future.
The point of security home personal or other wise is not to be an easy target. Make the bad guys go after the weaker part of the herd.
Most of the US supplemental gardening is easy. I suspect a PO crisis will be slow enough to allow us to learn how to farm.
More later...but very respectfully TG80 sends
Thxs for responding. I profoundly agree with your points, but I see where the brevity of my posts can sometimes misconvey the wrong info.
I have had earlier discussions with other Blackwater Associates in the Yahoo:AlasBabylon forum. I have no doubts as to your ability to assimilate into a biosolar lifestyle, probably easier that most of us. But your unique skill specialization is best optimized, in the early stages, to the outward defensive focus until the invasive threat subsides. The defense of biosolars, so that they can hopefully optimize a surplus unhindered to share with their protectors, is crucial. After that, the beating of most swords into plowshares will be welcomed by all.
Zimbabwean soldiers cannot be compared to modern Special Forces--I regret that some made this connection due to my posting. I was using Mugabe's mismanagement of farming as an illustrative example of the wrong way to build a biosolar community.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
My understanding of history is that the Romans used the promise of farmland as an incentive to be a soldier or centurion. Being fluent in the both ancient Greek and Latin, I can assure you that farming and soldiering were quite intertwined 2000 years ago.
If you want the modern perspective on this, you can watch Gladiator with Russell Crowe.
Ever heard of the Elysian Fields? What do you think those were? Fenway Park? Muslims have their fantasy of 99 black-eyed virgins, or whatever. The Romans liked the idea of growing wheat.
Study of the Thirty Years War will provide a slightly different but oddly similar picture.
Soldiers are good farmers. Soldiers were good farmers. Soldiers can be good farmers. Soldiers are farmers. What am I missing?
Thxs for the historical info addition to the discussion. Any sane soldier would prefer 'No Thanks--I like Empty Tanks' to the alternative. Hopefully, this offers our best chance to avert the '3 Days of the Condor' scenario and will set us on a course of Heinberg's Powerdown. Recall the retired generals reminding the active military staff to re-examine their Pledge to the Constitution, not their willingness to follow Presidential orders. It seems this would be our last chance to avert the worst. I hate it when global forces are left hanging on such a precariously frayed thin string. Yikes!
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?