I just had a "power lunch" w/ some senior members of my RR.  I was asking about the capital spending projects underway re: laying new track.  He did acknowledge that we are go back and adding second main tracks to some heavily congested areas, mainly coming out of the west and moveing east.  There is a giant double mainline tack being laid from LA it loops down through AZ, TX, and come back north to Kansas City.  This is the largest track project currently.

In addition he said we have a monopoly on the tracks that are coming out of most ALL ethanol plants.  This was done roughly 3 years ago and our tracks are connected directly to many, many refineries.  As he said, "you can't pipe ethanol."  I didn't know if that was true, so I left it alone.

Lastly he said LNG is not an option, at least from a RR standpoint and he went on the knock it for what it was.  He also said we've been moving heavy equipment up to Alaska in anticipation of a need.  I wonder how soon we'll have that "need."

Ethanol cannot be piped for several reasons.
  1. It tends to separate in the presence of moisture.
  2. It is a powerful stripping agent, and tends to remove corrosion and similar debris in pipelines, which ends up in the liquid.
I did the smile and nod when he said it...thanks for the info.
1. It tends to separate in the presence of moisture.

Well actually no. The problem is it doesn't tend to separate. Water and ethanol are mutually soluble in all mixtures. So the water is just taken up by the EtOH and goes merrily along with it. Hydrocarbons do not mix with water, which can be separated from the stream by a simple sump, a low place in the pipe, whatever. (I'm not intimate with pipeline technology but do have a bit of lab experience)

As for (2), all that wet ethanol tends to rust things. That, and even anhydrous ethanol is a polar solvent, which has more of a tendency to remove lubricants and coatings or soften them to where they no longer stay in place.

You have to make all your pipelines and equipment out of different materials than you do for hydrocarbons. Since it's kinda expensive to replace thousands of miles of pipe, they'll just truck it. There will be this interval of time while TPTB come to their senses, and they can truck the ethanol for that long. Or TPTB won't come to their senses, and the whole system will collapse. In which case they can also stop trucking the ethanol.

OTOH, I believe synthetic- or bio-diesel, can go through existing pipes without much trouble.

Thank you for the more complete answer, DIY. I was going from memory and layman's understanding, which as we all know is sometimes not entirely up to snuff.
Ka Ching!  How long do you think we can keep a charade of promising this as the best alternative?  Some variables I see are the subsidy currently making it "viable."  Keep in mind we were subsidizing the oil co's even as they have been earning.  SO I think the subsidy can go on for a long long time.  Also the 30% reduction in mileage should wake a whole lotta people up. It won't until people are actually using it.
Did the topic of electrification come up ?

BTW, I would like to forward an eMail copy of my conference handout to you.

Please send me an eMail at Alan_Drake@Juno.com