And this is as good a place as any to add some detail from the AOCS conference.

Much discussion there about biodiesel vs ethanol versus other liquid fuels.  This was a lipid conference so many more details about biodiesel from vegetable sources.  First some details from a talk by Frank Gunstone from St. Andrews University.

As of 2005 There was a total of 135 million metric tons of lipids cycled through.  These are from Fish, animal and vegetable sources.  Animals are via rendering and is becoming a smaller % each year.  OF that 135 M metric tons about 80% went to food, 14% to oleochemistry and 6% to feed and other.  By 2020 these numbers may have to increase by 40% just to keep up with population growth.

A significant chunk of those lipids and fats are part of a food stream, not dedicated lipid production.  There is significant potential to increase lipid production by planting more oil seed crops.  A lot of comes from corn but it is a poor oil producer (<6% oil typically in grain) compared to something like an oil palm.  Really 2 sources accounted for the fast majority of oil seed lipids in 2005, soybeans and oil palms.  2005 was the first year that palm oil was greater than soy oil.  

That growth in palm oil is really critical because oil production for palms is up to 5 tons per acre per year while soy beans are less than one ton.  There can be an increase in non food grade lipids much faster than lipids from food sources would indicate.

Lastly for today.  A talk on biodiesel showed that the EROEI for biodiesel from bare ground to in the tank is 3.2-1. I believe this is for soybeans in the U.S. Very positive and much better than ethanol.  The biodiesel numbers include fertilizer and all input costs.  

More later on this conference when I have time.

Palm oil plantations are really bad for the environment - not that any Amurrikan would care, just so long as they can drive their SUV.
On the upside, diverting lipids to biodiesel instead of food will help out health-wise by cutting calories in food. (similar to the upside of ethanol from sugar) Reducing obesity saves energy used by healthcare. A prime example is savings on pharmoceuticals to treat obesity-caused illness like high blood pressure, diabetes, etc. Pharmoceuticals production creates a lot of waste products from the synthesis. Think of clandestine meth labs and hazmat teams to clean up the crime scene. Has anyone taken into account healthcare savings in the ERoEI of ethanol?
This is an upside if you reduce the calories from the diets of fat people who eat too much. Not so good if the calories are reduced from those diets who are already marginal.

In which regions are these oils produced? Whose diets and ecosystems is this ramped-up production going to affect?

These oils are produced in America.

Ramped up production will benefit the diets and the ecosystems of Americans.

Savvy?

Palm oil is not produced in America, Stryker, because oil palms are tropical plants, Arecaceaes. The African Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis) is native to west Africa, occurring between Angola and Gambia, while the American Oil Palm (Elaeis oleifera) is native to tropical Central America and South America.  Freezing temperatures kill both dead.

Please do try to avoid being an overly enthusiastic and uninformed shill for every bio feedstock that comes down the pipe.

OK, you got me with being a bit Americano-centric with the upside post. In Brasil, the people are rather poor (except for the drivers) so diverting sugar could cause a problem. That's likely true in other sugarcane producing places. We Americans oversugar our foods with high-fructose corn syrup, so our diverting HFCS is a good thing. But Splenda needs sucrose from sugarcane as the feedstock. Fortunately, Splenda is 600 times sweeter than sugar, so diverting sugar to Splenda is a minimal load.

With palm oil, that comes from poor places too, so inadequate calories for food can be a problem there like Brasil. All in all, biofuel of all types hits a limit way before the quantity that allows driving SUVs on long-range commutes.

Better yet, don't make the fuel and let people walk.
Reducing obesity saves energy used by healthcare

We had better plan on turning off TV then if this reporting is correct:

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2006/05/02/feeding-crime/

Highlights:
"Each hour increase in television viewing", it found, "was associated with an additional 167 kilocalories per day"

"Researchers in Finland found that all 68 of the violent offenders they tested during another study suffered from reactive hypoglycaemia: an abnormal tolerance of glucose caused by an excessive consumption of sugar, carbohydrates and stimulants such as caffeine(6)."

"The number of violent incidents caused by inmates in the control group (those taking the placebos) fell by 56%, and in the experimental group by 80%."