Maybe. If I was attempting to predict which areas of the USA would react violently to post-PO conditions, I would have to bet on the areas that are currently violent crime-ridden. You don't need a complicated cohesion equation for this-just look at the stats.  
Sure. But the interesting question for social scientists is why do you get the crime to begin with? Why do you get violence and mass killing in area A but not area B? Crime? What causes the crime?
IMO, there are many reasons. Cultural,educational,economic and access to effective weaponry.
Motive and opportunity.

Don't you watch all those detective shows?

Actually, the move to suburbia was middle and upper America's response to crime of the 1960's. It removed the "opprotunity" part of the equation.

Pervasive public transport allowed roving gangs of young people to move easily from one neighborhood to another in the "inner cities" of the 1960's. Older people don't commit as many crimes because --well they are old & slow, and perhaps they have developed a set of morals (except for Enron execs). So the violent crimes problem is mostly one of gangs of unemployed males.

It is the expansive highway system and the need for expensive cars that keeps large gangs from forming in Suburbia (outside of school grounds). Recently, we have advanced to "gated" communities. Why?

Did the scare for nuclear war play a role during the early cold war?

I know there were plans to evacuate large cities in Sweden and disperse the population on the countryside in case of total mobilization during the early cold war.
Building suburbia is more or less a volotary preemptive evacuation.

These plans were later replaced with a shelter building program. Maintaining the shelter stock is more or less what is left of our civil defence, hardly any are built nowdays. :-(

They are not especially fancy, the minimum spec on later generations were detonation of a bomb with 125 kg of TNT in 125 kg of steel casing with no further containment 5 m from a wall or roof, 50 kPa long lasting overpreassure or 8 kPa long lasting underpreassure, 97.5% fallout reduction, basic NBC filtering with 60 Pa overpreassure, 72h livability with one person per 0.75 m2 and 50 year design life lenght of the construction. Finnish and Swiss designs seems to have better minumum radiation specs and the Finns have added roof concrete spalling reinforcments as a minimum requirement.

But the Finns and probably the Swiss continue with complete shelter building, I envy those that are wiser.

Most of the hardened civil defence structures being built nowdays in Sweden are overground or partly buried control centers for municipiality fire brigades and county disaster control centers. Almost every municipiality had an N hardened small civil defence control center built in bedrock, most of them are now abandoned or used as server halls, backup storage and so on. But they had the drawback that they took longer to mobilize then having a control center next to city hall. What is slowly being built today is the ability to react on for instance a traffic accident with nasty chemicals in an urban area.

We also had civil defence battalions and brigades that had mobiliziation depots distributed around cities and towns with massive ammounts of pneunmatic jackhammers, diamond saws and so on to get people out of shelters below fallen buildings. All gone now since we in the future wont have anythings as old time as a war in Europe. I realy hope that is a good prediction of the future.

Hello Prodigal Son,

I believe the answer to your questions can be partially derived from studying Genetics and Memetics:  Googling Hans Selye's General Adaption Syndrome [GAS] and the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness [EEA] which obviously includes 'inclusive fitness'.  Evolved behavioral switches, which can be probabilistically extended to larger social groupings, combined with entropic decline forms the basis of discussions by Diamond, Tainter, Hanson, et al--what I call the Thermo-Gene Collision.

Isaac Asimov's Foundation concepts of predictive collapse and directed decline uses Hari Seldon's psychohistorical analyses to mitigate decline.  I have no proof that any governmental orgs are using supercomputer simulations to do the same--it remains beyond my discovery-- yet historical trends seem to point to various manipulations.

We have had long ranging debates on certain Yahoo forums about this Foundation possibility and ultimately agreed to  disagree about the existence of such an entity.

Evolutionary inevitability vs. human exercise of freewill is obviously a volatile topic, yet Overshoot and Dieoff occurs constantly in Nature.  I believe humans will be very, very lucky if we can optimally mitigate our own decline-- the odds are against us when one considers the totality of the forces arrayed towards a plague specie.

Here are a few links to get you started:

http://www.objectivethought.com/articles/psychohistory.html

http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2006/4/17/194059/296

Thus, there is a very good reason Asimov's Foundation Series was voted the best Hugo Science Fiction Award-- a tantalizing glimpse of a possible Rosetta Stone to predict how masses of humans will behave and how to control them.  Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein, Aldous Huxley, H. G. Wells, Darwin, Malthus, et al, were way, way ahead of their time.

Peakoil and climate change is just thermodynamics [physics in action], the real interesting stuff is on the human genetic and behavioral side.  Googling Foundation brings up everything from Al-Qaeda [the base or foundation!] to Joseph Caldwell [a nuclear weapons scientist's prediction of our demise in a full-on nuclear gift exchange to less than 500 million]:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda
http://www.foundationwebsite.org/
http://www.foundationwebsite.org/WhoAmI.htm

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?