This came up in another recent thread.  I dropped this link then as well:

http://todd.cleverchimp.com/blog/?p=125

It might be that an electric bike beats some diets, but some diets beat an electric bike.

If the food is available, eating more, and burning more, is a closer match to our pre-agricultural roots:

The average daily energy expenditure, as physical activity, of Stone Age humans is estimated at approximately 5.2 MJ (1240 kcal) and their total caloric intake at approximately 12.1 MJ (2900 kcal) (Cordain et al., 1998). Their subsistence efficiency was thus approximately 2.25 kJ (kcal) acquired for each kilojoule (kilocalorie) expended in physical activity. In contrast, sedentary humans in contemporary affluent societies commonly consume perhaps 8.5 MJ (2030 kcal) with expenditure, as physical activity, of approximately 2.3 MJ (555 kcal) (Cordain et al., 1998), a subsistence efficiency of 3.66 to 1.

PDF article

Odo,

I will buy those figures. Though the issue I raised about the life expectancy, is probably also relevant. Post peak, I expect the standard of living, quality of life, and the quality of diet to significantly reduce. Under these conditions, hard physical labour (approximating that of an Indian rickshaw puller) would definitely bring down the life expectancy of individuals -- that should have an impact on the total energy used, and the total impact of an individual on the planet.