Yes, but your belief is primarily based on the fact that one of the two political parties our country has wants to kill the program.  It's fairly easy to save SS.  It's really not that complex or difficult.  The reason we here all these complex plans is because Republicans want to find a way to get rid of the program, and they can't do so out in the open due to its popularity.  

I have to hand it to Republican propaganda on this issue.  They have been very successful.  

My proposal is that we fund Social Security/Medicare with a tax on energy consumption.
I have no problem with this. The EIA puts current spending on energy at about 8% of GDP. Current spending on SS and Medicare is about 6% of GDP, so we need roughly a 75% tax on top of current energy prices. Being self-employed, and probably making less than $93K this year, I'm paying 15% of my earned income in payroll taxes. If I can drop that in return for an energy tax that looks like about 6% of my income, I'll be better off than I am now. The poorest workers, who spend more of their household income on energy than the average, will be worse off. Poor pensioners, who pay no payroll taxes and little income tax, will be substantially worse off.