Given these numbers, does anyone doubt that this will eventually be done?
The pure insanity of using nuclear weapons to blow holes in the Earth in order to produce oil nicely captures everything that is wrong with our current culture. I can see this being done before meaningful efforts at curbing demand begin i.e. -- 'Nuke that grass, I want gas!'
I could not have said it better myself.

I think we're going to see every crazy friggin' scheme possible tried, anything, anything at all, for oil.

The AEC proposed another version of this nuttery way back in the early 1970s, (IIRC), to boost the rock flow of conventional oil reserves.

On the Western Slope, many of these people are "downwinders" from Nevada N-Tests; even given the gung-ho attitude of Westerners toward many things, they are NOT going to embrace something like this.

Exactly. Too many cowbows' kids have had their thyroid glands removed to make them want to go with this option.

Also, who would want to buy radioactive gasoline?

the same people who think you can handle pure uranium and plutomium with your bare hands?
Hello MicroHydro,

Somehow, I think the insurance underwriters would refuse to offer coverage-- the risks of something going wrong are probably too high.  Using the govt as the insurer of last resort would be like asking New Orleans residents to fully and faithfully trust the govt again.  The only way to get this done is when the military is so desperate for fuel that they will shoot anyone that stands between them and the oil, and if a nuclear accident or something worse happens-- it will just be considered as collateral damage.

Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
 

These guys aren't going to wreck my organic garden and farm, are they?
Hello Don in Colorado,

If they do-- it will be unintentional--but of course that won't make you feel any better.  I am no geologist, but setting off all those nukes might possibly wreck the surrounding water tables or aquifers with earthquakes and ground settling.  Maybe jumpstart a volcano too?  Having plenty of local oil, but suddenly having no nearby water seems like a bad tradeoff to me.

Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

I kind of like the volcano idea, Bob.

I built my house out of concrete-reinforced rastra block. I think it could survive the concussion of nuclear blasts on the other side of the Grand Mesa, but I still need uncontaminated water, and too much dust from nuclear fallout might really make my passive solar windows inoperative.

Maybe we should all move to Tahiti ...

Don

Since you apparently live in Colorado, you should know that the Colorado constitution requires a vote of the people for undergound nuclear blasting.  I helped put it on the ballot in 1975.  

Hi tstreet,

I was a kid reporter at the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel during the last oil shale boom. At least that one was only a figurative "boom."

I'm hoping for a global recession that will make oil shale once again the energy source of the future ...

It's fair to assume that The Empire isn't going to allow itself to collapse for want of a few billion barrels of oil.  Many seem to think that the end of cheap oil will pave (irony intended) the way for establishing some sort of low-tech, sustainable utopia.  But such will not be the case, and HO's post reminds us why.

The problem is that power structures exist because they lift the most aggressive individuals (and families) to the top of the heap, where upon they live a very priviledged existence.  Nothing new here, just that exploitation of fossil energy has taken the pyramid to new heights.  If maintaining the pyramid means trashing the planet one acre at a time, that is really no problem for those on top of the heap.  It's only a problem for those on the bottom whose land, drinking water, air and quality-of-life will ultimately be sacrificed for "the greater good."

So, as TPTB ponder the energy precipice, I expect to hear a lot more proposals like this one -- high-tech, so that implementation is only possible by those with the "right" money and political connections, and with a huge potential for payoff, even if it makes a mess of someone else's life.  Same with "solutions" to GW.  I've recently begun to hear of schemes to control GW by placing foreign materials into the upper atmosphere so as to reflect a portion of the sun's energy back into space.  No doubt some of the great minds at the Pentagon are already seeing the $$$ on that one.