87 comments on Rick Dworsky: A Warm Bath of Energy -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
87 comments on Rick Dworsky: A Warm Bath of Energy -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils, for time is the greatest innovator.”
—Francis Bacon, Essays
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I love it when the techno worshippers say "probably." It usually means the new process, chemical, or machine will destroy yet another vast part of the ecosystem.
The sad thing is, they will probably do it -- right along with the coal and nuclear and burning our food crops.
Why not use our intelligence to get us out of the techno-fix business and work on devolving our tech and reducing our population?
Of course, that will not happen.
Great article, by the way, on the evolutionary basis of war and competition for natural resources at: Evolutionary Psychology, Memes and the Origin of War.
For the intelligent to avoid having offspring of their own is very feasible, of course. The problem would be getting everyone on earth to do the same. How would you set about it?
First, everybody is required to fill out the questions to determine their footprint - not so much how they live, but how they 'pledge' or 'promise' or 'contract' to live in the 'new world'. After you make your contract agreeing to how you will live, it figures out your expected foot print. From there you are entered into the 'lottery', with your odds of 'winning' the lottery equal to 1:<your footprint>. If it is determined that you will live with in a foot print that is sustainable you automatically win. If you want to live a lifestyle that is 1:30, well, only 1 in 30 will win, and the others are made into fertilizer. If you break your contract, you have the same fate.
Kevin
Sodium Hypochlorite can be made on location and quickly reacts with organic material to make sodium chloride. Since the source material is in the seawater your killing plankton in EXTREMELY small quantities. As for reducing the population will you promise not to breed? For the sake of the world I mean.
Matt (AKA Bubba)