![]() | DrumBeat: June 4, 2006 | The Oil Drum | Rick Dworsky: A Warm Bath of Energy -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion | ![]() |
313 comments on DrumBeat: June 5, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
313 comments on DrumBeat: June 5, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“I'd put my money on solar energy… I hope we don't have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle that.”
—Thomas Edison, in conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone, March 1931
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
While this may have been true a long time ago, please read some more on this.
http://www.safehaven.com/article-3097.htm
If you want the whole story look at this website. It's got plenty of graphs to back this data up.
>Fed has decided not to publish M3 (Its still calculated by the Fed, just not released)
Really? So when the Fed said it was ending the release of the M3 data, what was their reasoning? I could have swore they said something like, "the costs to prepare the data does not justify the information it provides." M2 is sufficient according to them, however M2 data does not include repurchase agreements. What don't you understand about liquidity? It doesn't take bills being "printed." Money is created everywhere through various financial instruments. There are securities for sale that base their value on an underlying security. There are securities of those securities.
So if this is the reasoning and now you're telling me they are still data mining. While I would agree that this could go on, if we agree that it is going on, itt would be proof that the FED is lying. Who cares what they are doing THEN. Do you trust a private bank (proxy for gov't) that lies to the American Public?
China is still accululating dollar reserves. Back in Jan 2006, China held about $800 Billion, Today its approaching on $900 Billion.
Below is an
http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&fr=ush1-finance&p=China+Reserves&u=www.chin ability.com/Reserves.htm&w=china+reserves&d=Y7bpOzmtM4Pv&icp=1&.intl=us
>The surprise here is that China and Japan are doing what they said they would do, even selling off some of their holdings. If Japan and China are not buying the government debt, who is buying?
China diversifaction was from US treasuries into the US mortgage debt market. If I recall correctly 1/3 to 1/2 of all new mortgage debt after 2003 is held by China. This is why the mortgage rates didn't rise in step with treasuries.
>I could have swore they said something like, "the costs to prepare the data does not justify the information it provides."
The cost for public consumption was the issue. However. All large financial institutions are still required to collect and provide the data to the Fed. Perhaps the data isn't been used to calculate an "M3" figure, its still used by the fed. I suspect that the reason for discontinuing publication is hide how fast the money supply is growing and prevent it from spooking the bond markets.
>Unfortunately, the US Treasury is unable to capture the true source of this money since they only know the first party of their transactions.
The source is mostly large hedge funds, using carry trades to make money. The Caribbean are relatively small. If I recall correctly, back in early 2005 it was about $70 billion, where as Japan had over $550 Billion and China was somewhere between $300 and $400 Billion in Treasury withholdings. If the gov't wanted to secretly expand the money supply, why bother using a front? They could just buy and hold treasuries with out any paper trail. Why would the gov't bother expanding the treasury bond market by creating new debt. Why not just fictiously deposit funds in electronic banking accounts instead of raising funds through the treasury market?
>What don't you understand about liquidity? It doesn't take bills being "printed." Money is created everywhere through various financial instruments. There are securities for sale that base their value on an underlying security. There are securities of those securities.
I think your missing the point. The money supply is expanding just fine with all of the various capital inputs. For instance, we have the $600+ billion trade deficit, Easy credit fueled by the housing bubble and comsumer debt growth, bond carry trades, Federal deficit spending and so on. With all these sources of input capital there is no need for secret gov't transactions to further inflate the money supply. All the fed needed to do is drop the rates by ~550 bps to kick it off. If they wanted to accelerate it further, they just need to lower the rates again.