26 comments on Questions About the World's Biggest Natural Gas Field
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
26 comments on Questions About the World's Biggest Natural Gas Field
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“I'd put my money on solar energy… I hope we don't have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle that.”
—Thomas Edison, in conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone, March 1931
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
However, something has happened in the last 2 weeks with back month NG prices
All winter and spring, when front month 2006 prices were crashing from $15 to under $6 due to incredibly mild winter, the back month stuff stayed very tight on all time highs - it has plummeted in recent weeks while front month has rallied a skootch. This is consistent across months starting in 2007. So there is definitely another side to this story - some big players chose last 2 weeks to have confidence in nat gas being more plentiful in 2008, 2009, 2010 than they previously had.
IMO, North America is one long hot summer or one colder than average winter away from a real gas crisis. The LNG imports will not be ready in time to avert this.
The big issue to me is that natural gas must be, "not too hot, not too cold, but juuust right...."
If the natural gas price is too high, it destroys demand in the U.S. as people will try to "fuel switch" to electricity from cheaper coal even if that means more CO2 release (logic: I don't have to pay the "full price" of global warming, but I sure have to pay the full price, and NOW, to heat my home), and as companies "outsource" to places in the world with cheaper natural gas, and damage employment in the process.
But, if the natural gas price goes too low, the pipelines and LNG projects cannot possibly be done at a profit. This means that, as one other poster said, "one bad winter" could be catastrophic, because the lead time needed to have the gas pipeline and LNG plants up and providing gas is years. By the time we realized we needed the gas, we could not possibly build the infrastrure fast enough (go to TOD UK and look at exactly this situation in Britain) to save the U.S. from a very serious (and in New England/upper midwest states, a possibly deadly) supply problem. The LNG and Alaska gas pipeline are two perfect examples of projects that even thier backers admit must have a "sustainably high" price for natural gas to find investors/backing.
Right now, though, the price is bearish, as back to back to back to back mild winter/summer/winter/summer has led to an astounding amount of spare gas (and propane likewise, the great under utilized fuel is easily stored and in the summer, cheap and in surplus).
The best thing we could do is try to build faciliteis to store even more gas and propane, so that when we have these mild spells, we have somewhere to save the fuel for a rainy day!
Roger Conner known to you as ThatsItImout
OTOH, storing a moderate amount of propane as a liquid in a pressurized tank in a vehicle seems to me as a better way to go than pressurized (but still gaseous) methane. Why is that not done as often? Perhaps because methane has a price advantage over gasoline, while propane does not.
Talking about price, from what I've read, a large part of the propane supply (in the USA) is as a byproduct of the refining of oil, which may explain why its price is unlinked from that of NG, and tracks oil fairly well, despite NG "liquids" being the other source of much propane. As usual, the price is determined by the marginal, most expensive, source.