I don't know about you but its well known that steam and carbonate rocks don't mix well. With dissovled co2 readily avialable in a oil well you probably get a pretty nice carbonate mobilizing agent. I'm sure steam works for a while but its got to cause massive mobilization and deposition of carbonate over any longer term.

Anyone know ?

The WSJ article mentioned that there are no large scale steam injection programs in carbonates, and the energy reporter on CNBC noted that a lot of experts are skeptical.

I have previously described my "Iron Triangle" thesis, to-wit, that most housing/auto/finance companies; most media companies and most oil exporters/major oil companies/energy analysts have a vested interest in persuading energy consumers that all is well--just keep buying and financing large homes and autos.

The oil exporters/major oil companies/energy analysts provide the intellectual ammunition for the media to spread the word that Peak Oil is bogus.   Note that the second paragraph of the WSJ article had the following:  "It would also be a blow to so-called peak-oil theorists who have forecast that world oil production is on the brink of peaking."

There is a little bit of unintentional irony in the article, when the authors note that conventional recovery factors are typically about 35%--which is about where Ghawar, the largest producing oil field in the world, is at.   Do you think that there might be a connection between this PR release by the Saudis, on the front page of the WSJ, and collapsing production in the Ghawar Field?

wt
have you ever read this book
http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy.html
it's a real eye opener
and here's an interesting page that starts to show how hard aramco et. al. will work to sell the status quo
http://www.prwatch.org/search/node/arabia