The NYTimes are spreading more propaganda than it did during the run-up to the Iraq war.

More of a prescription for global warming than energy independence.

Coal will save us:
"The one with the biggest potential -- estimated to displace 29 percent of imported oil -- is making liquid fuels from coal, using the Fischer-Tropsch method."

We can pump more out of the North Slope and West TX than exists:
"A second is to take the carbon dioxide created in both that process and other processes and pump it into old oil fields to push more oil to the surface, a technique called enhanced oil recovery."

Same as #1:
"A third is to use biomass, including wood and crop wastes, as feedstock for factories that make a fuel gas consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. That so-called synthesis gas is the same as that made from coal in the Fischer-Tropsch method and it can then be turned into a liquid."

"The fourth is production of oil from shale, a technique tried after the oil shock of 1979, but abandoned when prices fell."

Little about:
Conservation
Light Rail
Peak Oil
Higher CAFE standards
Global Warming
Etc.

Re:  North Slope

http://www.adn.com/money/industries/oil/story/7964034p-7857193c.html
North Slope oil output took triple hit in June
FACTORS: Lisburne issues, warmth, overall declines in old fields hurt monthly tally.

By KRISTEN NELSON
Petroleum News

Published: July 14, 2006
Last Modified: July 14, 2006 at 02:25 AM

Excerpt:

A triple-whammy of seasonally warmer weather, which reduces compressor efficiency, continued pipeline shutdowns at the Lisburne field and declining output from older fields resulted in a drop in North Slope oil production in June.

The June average was 792,592 barrels per day, 3.6 percent lower than in May and 8 percent lower than in June 2005, according to the state Department of Revenue.

Speaking of global warming...

First Half of 2006 Is Warmest on Record

And it sure feels like it, this weekend...  :-P

Totally agreed... ignores CO2 oilfield injection already ongoing, as though this will be a magic bullet that is suddenly newfound.

Second, it ignores the massive water use, earthen byproducts pollution, etc. of the F-T process.

Third, when an article like this starts talking about oil shale as a realistic part of the solution, you know it has no anchorage in reality.