The security aspect of on-going, commercial (i.e. private), major-scale multi-decade mining using many functional nuclear bombs per mine is interesting to contemplate.  Is the scenario that Exxon and Shell etc eventually manufacture the nuclear explosives themselves?  Maybe there is a third party.  China  is good at keeping costs down. Or North Korea?  If the goal is commercial, as for this oil production purpose it must be, one would want the process fully competitive.  I'm sure we'd want to keep the monopolistic government out of bomb manufacture!  I would also hope the security situation wouldn't drive up the labor costs too much - there must be some good way to control access to hundreds of atomic bombs by thousands of coming and going mining employees for decades that is both safe and cheap.  
Didn't Dupont make the first one?
Well, they wouldn't be called bombs of course.  They would have to be called something less inflammatory, such as extreme thermal expansion devices, and they would of course be purchased on the open market.  One imagines that China would have the best price -- but Pakistan is probably not too far behind.