101 comments on Extreme Production Measures
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
101 comments on Extreme Production Measures
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Politics and Peak Energy
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric cars an 'attractive proposition' for Australia
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Horizontal drilling makes many low permiability reservoirs increase their economic recovery by 300% or more, and the same is true for waterflood and gas pressure maintainence.
I'm not suggesting that this is true for all reservoirs, butI do believe that use of language such as extreme can taint the debate.
Re: "many reservoirs need "extreme" methods to be economicially viable..." and "Horizontal drilling makes many low permiability reservoirs increase their economic recovery by 300% or more..."
In the interest of everyone, be more specific. It's not clear to me whether some deepwater wells can be produced in any other way or even if alternative methods have been developed and tried. And what about onshore drilling? When you've got a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Any aggressive production technique or approach that is meant to increase short-term recovery rates...
I'm not an engineer, I am a landman. In other words I help contract with landowners to get the property to drill oil wells.
But, horizontal drilling has made a lot of areas economic, such as the Austin Chalk or the Barnett shale. As was pointed out above, pressure maintainence starts at day one on a lot of reservoirs.
The majors and the engineers claim that recovery has increased by 50% or more on reservoirs discovered now as opposed to oil fields that were drilled up in the 1920's. I cant prove that but I believe they are correct.
I feel that the real problem is population growth. There are at least 10 times as many oil consumers in the world as there were 50 years ago. We are looking at a very steep slope because of demand as well as the exhaustion of the big fields. There will still be a lot of oil produced in 20 or 30 years, just not nearly enough to satisfy demand no matter what the price.
Also, some reservoirs of heavy crude would not be economic at all without enhanced techniques. Look at Chevron's wells at Bakersfield that require steam to produce, or any of the tar sands that are going to save us all according to the majors.
I can't be specific about the math or what percentage of oil is produced with "extreme" techniques. I lack the knowlege, but I bet someone around TOD does have the info. I would love to know.
I would like to see any articles on the peaking of world light sweet crude.
Please check out this link:
http://www.opec.org/home/Monthly%20Oil%20Market%20Reports/2005/pdf/MR082005.pdf
It is the OPEC August 2005 report. Go to page 5 paragraph 2.
Basically they say that the future world refining capacity that is built should reflect the kind of crude being extracted, namely the heavier one.
Hope that this is the kind of information that you were looking out for.
Page 4 indicates that what growth has recently take place in light oil in the recent past is in light sour oil. Page 5 indicates that growth outside OPEC in the 2007 to 2010 period is expected to be predominantly medium, balanced between sweet and sour. OPEC capacity expansions in the same period are expected to be overwhelmingly medium and heavy and predominantly sour.