69 comments on A Different Way to Perform the Hubbert Linearization
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
69 comments on A Different Way to Perform the Hubbert Linearization
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Pumping the fear factor out of oil
As more production comes online over the next few years, prices may ease by as much as $20 a barrel.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/18/news/economy/oil_fear/index.htm
Peak Oil Passnotes: Supply 'Cushionitis'
By Edward Tapamor
18 Aug 2006 at 11:49 AM EDT
PARIS (ResourceInvestor.com) -- You have seen what Resource Investor was mooting about the oil market last week, basically come true. Oil has actually fallen a little faster than we expected - to around $71 - but it still has an important couple of barriers to break before it goes really wild to the downside. So let us take a little look at some recent history and see if we can figure out why.
On April 21st the Nymex WTI price reached $75.17 on the back of worries over Iran and general supply tightness. By June the Nymex WTI was at $69 before it set off on its latest run. In other words it had hit a strong high before falling back. It then surged back once more to hit $78.40 on July 14th before dropping off once again. Then we reached an odd moment a few days ago, on August 7th when some genuine myopic hysteria set in around the crude markets.
Brent crude had broken up past the WTI by August 7th as supplies of Brent became constrained by declines and increasing seasonal demand, pushing up past its historically higher-priced relative. The price was spurred by a number of reasons, not of which were crystal clear. One being the Israeli attack on Lebanon, others being the problems in Nigeria and the first signs of the difficulties for BP [NYSE:BP; LSE:BP] at Prudhoe Bay.
At the time we pointed out that although significant these events were underpinned by the - now seemingly age old - supply cushion absence. As there was no supply cushion the market had driven itself into hysteria. The Prudhoe Bay outage was not that significant although it was not helpful. Lebanon did not produce oil even though indirectly the invasion was about energy being a proxy war between the U.S. and Iran. Nigeria was going on the same as it has been in recent months.
Brent boomed up to an all time record of $78.64 intraday and $78.30 at the close with the WTI chipping in at a healthy $77.05 at the end of trading.
Now just 10 days or so later Nigeria actually seems to have got worse, armed men stormed a bar in Port Harcourt (who calls a bar Goodfellas in a place like that?) although the short-term outage at Nembe Creek of around 180,000 barrels per day has been restored. Meanwhile the Lebanon situation is still not really impacting oil and its supply. BP on the other hand has managed to keep somewhere around half of its Prudhoe Bay output online, even so you will note that is a loss of some 200,000 barrels per day. A loss is after all a loss.
Yet we are seeing the WTI hit exactly $70 intraday, some seven dollars off its high in around eight days active trading. Brent is around $72. A big, big move to the downside.
There is one other reason, Goldman Sachs. They are not excited about the new gasoline contract for - cough - reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygenate blending or RBOB. New regulations in the U.S. have meant that RBOB is replacing methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) in gasoline. Sachs are not about to risk a load of cash on this new contract so they have simply stopped playing.
The result of such a big player leaving the table is that there is no liquidity - or relatively little - in the gasoline market. This has pulled down the price of gasoline which has impacted on the price of crude. So the combination of events, Lebanon ceasefire, Prudhoe Bay, staying half-online, Nembe Creek being repaired and RBOB illiquidity have stuck a knife in the gut of the oil price. Then we hear stuff like this.
"Some of the factors and disruptions that helped drive us to very high levels have been resolved now," according to a statement by from Eoin O'Callaghan at the French bank BNP Paribas.
No they have not.
Lebanon is not resolved, Nigeria is not resolved, Prudhoe Bay and BP's general behaviour is not resolved, Iran is still awaiting the outcome of its nuclear enrichment programme and demand is still healthy. What has happened is the market has seen a great time to take a big chunk of profits. A breather. That is all.
If we were smart guys we would open a book on the first "Oil Makes Dramatic Surge" headline. No doubt you will see it in the next sixty days. We will be told all the stories about collapse, markets imploding, frenetic activity on the trading floor and `peak oil freaks' will be telling us to ride Oxen to work. Then we will do the same dance all over again. Isn't energy great?
Did we burst your dreamy life? Have you read just enough about it to be only scared? Do you really think that CNN is not selling ads to : car, insurance, housing, bank and oil company so they can stay "impartial"
They dont want to tell you the truth, you cant handle the truth, the economy and those company either.
Oil = finite ressource
No matter what you think.
Hubbert Linearization is technique developped in 1956 and used since then to calculate the production of whole region or country.
Oil at 20$ may be next door but in that case we will have suffer a very deep, profond and large depression.
Unless you dont have some math background, you cannot increase oil consumption very much because of exponential growth. I suggest that you take a look at this presentation by prof Albert Bartlett you will see what we mean.
Again, we are very sorry to have woke you.
You should have taken the blue pill.
ohhhhhh, it's the great CNN conspiracy that has allowed oil prices to fall...somebody thank thme for me....and the Bloomberg conspiracy I bet kept them from going to....where...$200, $150 a barrel this past summer as was predicted by so many of the catastrophephists....somebody REALLY thank them for me! (By the way, as much as I admire them, why don't you all have a field day of ridicule when Simmons or Pickens blows predictions at least as bad as Yergin does? Fair is fair....this year everybody blew it....)
Yes oil is a finite resource, but that frankly don't tell us shiit...(quick,name something on Earth that is not a finite resource except for hungry mouths of beasts to feed, including us....ain't that a paradox?), but just being finite does not tell us HOW MUCH is out there, now does it?
"... we are very sorry to have woke you." Cute and humorously snide, but don't worry about waking us....some of us are a helll of a lot more awake than you give us credit for....
(now I am just waiting for that great MSNBC conspiracy to kick in so the prices will really come down....how'd a thought that bringing prices down could have been this easy? :-)
Roger Conner known to you as ThatsItImout
-best
But that does not seem to be of concern at TOD, 99.98% of the posts are about, when THIS particular Peak Oil will happen, brainstorming about technical "solutions" by mostly technologically ILLITERATES, anecdotes and gossip about life in the US (not so bad, entertaining at least) and endless haggling by Peak Deniers.
"Of course the only true problem is GROWTH in a finite environment!"
Maybe, but at the end of the day, that's biting off more than I can chew.
If I ruled by fiat, and everyone would obey my command to cease fornication (because after all, birth control pills require energy to make!), then maybe growth would cease.....but since I don't and everyone won't, it's a bit of a moot point, isn't it? Growth, like change, has probably been going on too damm long....but nobody knows how to make either one stop.
You say, "99.98% of the posts are about, when THIS particular Peak Oil will happen, brainstorming about technical "solutions" by mostly technologically ILLITERATES. That's actually not a bad overview. I have learned a couple of things since I came here:
- Everybody's a damm physicist! I didn't know we had so may physics genuises in the country, until every other post I read ended every debate about all the things that could not be done (half of them already being done somewhere) with the flat and knowing assertion, "the physics proves it" or "it's in the physics"....that second one has the cool resigned detachment of the old Bruce Hornsby song..."That's just the way it is....some things will never change.....", and then he takes the counter point, "but don't you believe it..." I prefer to take the counterpoint.
- Despite the fact that no one knows exactly how much oil and gas there is, or exactly how to define it, everybody knows to the day when we are going to peak! Astounding that! Both the optimists and the pessimists have this in common! Even the Dan Yergin's, despite having no idea whatsoever how much gas and oil is actually out there, completely relient on other people's word, says, we have plenty for the next decade! While the pessimists like Deffeyes who says that HL (Hubbert Linearization) is holy writ, even though Hubbert Linearization is based entirely on known URR (Ultimate Recoverable Reserves) when confronted on lack of any real knowledge of world URR by anybody, he changes gears and says, "Well, it's production that counts, reserves mean nothing! You can't pull up to the pump and fill up you car with reserves!" What do the optimists and the pessimists have in common? Despite having no idea how much is there, and what exactly counts (crude oil, all liquids, which of course makes nat gas interchangable with crude oil....despite another poster on TOD who recently shut his ears "hear no evil" fashion, "I have heard too much about bottled gas, there seems to be bottled gas everywhere!"...yep, the world is a confusing place!
- Despite everyone, EVERYONE saying "peak is not "running out!", when they talk you can hear they all have a mental picture of running out, right to the last drop!
Someone says "perhaps we can build windmills", they reply, "that takes oil" as though there won't be a pint left! Someone says, "perhaps we can build electric cars", they reply "that will take oil to produce them and the batteries".....what, won't there even be a few gallon?" Medication? "Big dieoff is coming, medication takes oil." Now, exactly how many tons of the oil consumed in the world, exactly what percent of the total tonnage goes to production of medication? (I am leaving aside the fact that many medicines and chemicals are made with natural gas processing for the moment, I love it when people on here will scream about how oil is used to make fertilizer! Well, actually, it's natural gas....but back to the point....) You mean that if we reduce the waste burning of crude oil, there still won't be even enough for medicines that actually use it in their production?You mean if everyone drove a 2 cylinder tin box like a Citreon 2CV, we would still run clear out, and be as Deffeyes says, "Stone age by 2030", or thereabouts? Does "Peak Oil" really mean a Fred Flintstone world?
The view of the world is sometimes childlike....growth is the problem, tell them to stop! and they will.....Technology? Go home and tell you daddy technology is BAD! It is a BAD THING!! If he is trying to develop technology, he is a BAD MAN! Don't let him fool you, and say it's efficient, it is still technology, and will use energy, and we will be OUT, it's BAD! He is an evil DENIER! Life in the U.S., it is a BAD THING!! It must stop, many must die! Then some will go on and do the right thing....with no TECHNOLOGY, the BAD thing that messed up the world!!
As you say, not so bad, entertaining at least, or at least it would be if it were not so sad, and the problem is far too serous, too complex, too much in need of sophisticated acceptance of real ideas, real modern maturity.
We are not as much paying the price for wasted energy, we are paying the greater price, as we knew we someday would, for wasted talent, preperation, mental ability to design, to concieve of more than yes/no, and to think in terms of multiple, interlocking options and confluent ideas. We are frankly stumbling in the dark, blind but hoping to pass ourselves off as "seers" who will lead the "ILLITERATES", the "screaming monkeys" and the "sheepies" out of the dark. Such are the terms we use to win over our disciples. That alone should tell you volumes.
Roger Conner known to you as ThatsItImout
You may prefer starving to choking but both are an ugly death.
every other post I read ended every debate about all the things that could not be done
"every other", yes, but the OTHER half was all about the miraculous solutions.
Just as unsubstanciated, illiteracy comes both ways.
The view of the world is sometimes childlike
To the point, but nobody is compelled to share so much optimism.
growth is the problem, tell them to stop! and they will...
Of course not, this is my point, telling won't do :
- Enforcing, not politically correct and LOTS of trouble, struggle, strife, unanswerable messy arguments.
- Die-off...
Go home and tell you daddy technology is BAD! It is a BAD THING!!
Are you speaking to me?
I thought I cleared up this in our previous discussions.
to pass ourselves off as "seers" who will lead the "ILLITERATES"
TPTB have been doing a hell of a job leading the illiterates , too bad the looming difficulties are WELL BEYOND THEIR SKILLS, in spite of the high appraisal they have of their capabilities.
we are paying the greater price, as we knew we someday would, for wasted talent, preperation, mental ability to design, to concieve of more than yes/no,
A "price", yes, ignorance can be remedied AT A COST, stupidity cannot.
What is the ratio between these 2 impediments, and, hoping for the best, can we bear the cost?