109 comments on So who do we believe?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
109 comments on So who do we believe?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“No civilization can survive the physical destruction of its resource base.”
—Bruce Sterling
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Bush said today that he would bring down gasoline prices by creating enough political good will with oil-producing nations that they would increase their supply of crude. "I would work with our friends in OPEC to convince them to open up the spigot, to increase the supply. Use the capital that my administration will earn, with the Kuwaitis or the Saudis, and convince them to open up the spigot." Implicit in his comments was a criticism of the Clinton administration as failing to take advantage of the good will that the US built with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia during the Persian Gulf war in 1991. Also implicit was that as the son of the president who built the coalition that drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait, Mr. Bush would be able to establish ties on a personal level that would persuade oil-producing nations that they owed the US something in return.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/More_George_W__Bush_Budget_&_Economy.htm
The Saudi and Kuwaiti elite (Sunni) have large Shiite minorities---the Shia of Saudi Arabia all happen to be in oil producing areas---and really don't want Iran pressuring them and causing rebellious ideas among their disadvantaged minorities.
That's why they supported Saddam against Iran in the 1980s---that little invasion of Kuwait wasn't in the plan---and especially why they were against invading Iraq this time. Because they knew the Arab Shia would take over in Iraq and that would give other people "bad ideas".
:)
If it turns out, retrospectively, that Saudi Arabia still currently has excess capacity, and could open the spigot if they wanted (and who can say that they coudn't?)...
then this current "oil crisis" will be seen, by future historians, as due exclusively to the ineptitude and adventurism of the Bush administration.
For better or for worse!
Yet the President and many others believe the lie that they are deliberately cutting back on production because of lack of buyers. Hell, let them lob off about five bucks off the price and see how many buyers they have.
The Flip side of the coin says that the President is indeed well aware of PO and knows very well that KSA is "maxed out". After All Matt Simmons was apart of the President's energy counsel. Cheney was also in the loop. The President believes that any direct acknowledgement will trigger a panic. For one, such a speech would destablize the ME further, possiblity resulting in the overthrow of House of Saud that suddenly ends all KSA oil exports (eg 1979 Iranian revolution). That certainly would not be an improvement. The US now imports 60% of its oil from oversea. What do you think would happen if 10% to 25% of Oil imports disappear with in the next 30 days? Absolute chaos.