126 comments on Depletion estimates and the CGES
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
126 comments on Depletion estimates and the CGES
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“To be thrown upon one's own resources, is to be cast into the very lap of fortune; for our faculties then undergo a development and display an energy of which they were previously unsusceptible.”
—Benjamin Franklin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
According to Matt Simmons, a retired Aramco executive said that Ghawar would never make more than 70 Gb (41% recovery). Matt also said that the world record recovery factor for this type of reservoir was 45%. I think that Ghawar is getting close to 60 Gb (35% of OOIP).
Note that depletion starts when the first barrel is produced and it never stops until the last barrel is produced. During this time period, a field can show rising production, stable production or falling production (some rate of decline), but regardless of whether production is increasing, flat or declining, depletion marches on.
Note that Shell was expanding their surface facilities at Yibal (same reservoir as Ghawar, also redeveloped with horizontal wells , just like Ghawar) to handle a projected increase in production, when the field started declining sharply, as the water hit the horizontal wells. If memory serves, the final decline at Yibal hit when the field had produced about 35% of OOIP.
> Note that Shell was expanding their surface facilities at Yibal
> (same reservoir as Ghawar, also redeveloped with horizontal wells,
> just like Ghawar)
Same reservoir? Not according to this http://www.ccreservoirs.com/DigitalAnalogs/carbonatereservoirs.htm
- Yibal - Shuiba fomation (Cretaceous)
- Ghawar - Arab D formation (Jurassic)
Plus I doubt whether Ghawar had many horizontal wells when it was producing 5.7 MMb/d in 1981 (which was apparently its all-time high, but that number came from Googling around randomly, so your estimate of Ghawar peak may vary).Sorry to be so curt but gotta rush... later...
PUD