Is Nuclear energy a feasible alternative to fossil fuels?  Definately; or rather partially yes.  If one were to rapidly move towards nuclearization of the electrical grid, one could then divert the "surplus" fossil fuels towards transportation, prolonging the peak / plateau hopefully enough to build the infrastructure for something else.

The reality of the matter though is whether you want the reactor in your back yard, or someone else's... Thats where the issue arises.

Or just operate electric transport fueled by nuclear reactors. Save the oil for other uses - fertilisers, explosives anything else.
If you can get the nukes to make hydrogen (via either thermochemical methods or high-temp electrolysis), all you need is a Haber plant and the fertilizer angle is covered.
that sounds neat... thanks. There is always a solution you never even thought of.
That's why I'm a cautious optimist; there's always something, but the PTB sometimes have to be sledgehammered into allowing it to be used as opposed to what the special interests (ethanol) want.
what is PTB please?
PTB is a TLA.

PTB = Powers That Be

TLA = Three-Letter Acronym

Okay, thanks. TMSTM.
BTW, thats a FLA.
OTOH, IMHO, TPB -> BTL.
Dohh. I mean:

OTOH, IMHO, PTB -> BTL.