<Server News and Check Out Our Advertisers... The Oil Drum Peak Update>
<DrumBeat: September 13, 2006 DrumBeat DrumBeat: September 15, 2006>

309 comments on DrumBeat: September 14, 2006

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version

Leanan on September 14, 2006 - 2:23pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
He has always thought that way.  That is what catabolic collapse means.

The reason I see that as the most doomerish outcome possible is that it means we do not change our ways.  Instead, we keep trying to do what we are doing, switching to ever poorer sources of energy.  Until all resources and capital are converted to waste, and we simply cannot continue.

The result is a crash to a lower population level and level of complexity than existed before the complex society arose or arrived, because the environment is so poor that it cannot support anything else.

The good news?  I probably won't have to worry about it, since it will take a hundred years or more.  :-/

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
dinopello on September 14, 2006 - 3:05pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
This is exactly how I feel.  It would be so nice to live in an age of renaissance, even if it had to be preceeded by an abrupt shock.  But, I fear I may live in an age of slow, relentless descent.  
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
PhilRelig on September 14, 2006 - 4:14pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Another drawback of the slow, relentless collapse scenario is that it greatly facilitates denial on the part of Peak Oil-naysayers; an abrupt collapse would at least be strongly convincing.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.

309 comments on DrumBeat: September 14, 2006

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version