55 comments on Addressing Proposition 87 Criticisms
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
55 comments on Addressing Proposition 87 Criticisms
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I agree completely, but Prop 87 will not do this quickly enough or do enough.
A quote from Ed Tennyson on what HAS WORKED in California
Below is a list of projects that WILL SAVE GAS IN CALIFORNIA and will NOT GET FEDERAL FUNDING FOR YEARS
Prop 87 monies could build these projects promptly with minimal (say 20% instead of 50% federal funding like Seattle) or no FTA funds. Unlike ethanol, Urban Rail becomes more useful the worse things become with oil. In most cases, all one has to do is buy more vehicles to expand capacity (LA Blue Line may be an exception and require some capital improvements to line).
More Urban Rail (quickly) is the proven method to reduce CA oil dependence !
Two of the three highest impact projects in the US are in Los Angeles
Light Rail Connector between Gold and Blue Lines
Red Line subway extension down to UCLA and then to Santa Monica
Also (not comphrensive list)
LA - Vermont subway, Green Line to LAX and then north to Santa Monica, capacity expansions for Blue lIne, Expo & Gold line extensions, streetcar feeders in downtown, "shelved" plans for hundreds of electric trolley buses
San Diego - North extension and then West Extension from UCSD
San Jose - BART to SJ, Light Rail extensions south
Bay Area - eBART, BART north to Marin County, third BART tunnel, electrify Caltran from San Jose to SF, more trolley lines in SF
Sacramento has more expansion plans on drawing board
Orange County may revisit Light Rail as Peak Oil approaches
California has considerably higher gas prices than the rest of the country, for example. Yesterday's price report still has California above $3, while the US average has been lower than $3 for several weeks. Maybe these high prices have played a role.
Another possible difference is increasing urbanization of the state. As the demographics have shifted from republican to democrat we might have seen an increase in the percentage of people who live in or near cities, decreasing driving distances.
The point is that in a state as large, populous, and geographically and demographically diverse as California, you will probably not find one factor that drives gasoline usage. Whether railroad travel is playing a significant role is not possible to determine from the evidence given.
(I understand that a gridlocked car gets lousy mileage, but I think the congestion keeps a greater number of cars from even making the attempt.)