72 comments on A Closer Look at Oil Futures
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
72 comments on A Closer Look at Oil Futures
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
It is clear that oil futures markets do not see real shortages post 2010. Hedge funds don't make long term assumptions, they mostly look for and ride trends. However, many investors in US E&P's are quite aware of po theory, and many of these, including myself, are investing on this basis. THe problem with futures is you can be right in the long term and get crushed short term.
My own preference, shared by many, is to invest in small US E&P's with low cost, growing reserves and earnings. These are companies that, by my definition (which counts reserves equally with earnings), are not yet fully valued in the marketplace. As such, they are usually bought at some point by larger companies having difficulty increasing their reserves; four of my former picks were bought last year. My current favorites are ard and gpor because, in addition to having the highest rating based on my own formula, analysts are projecting record earnings to continue at least through 07 based on oil prices somewhat lower than today's.
I avoid companies with foreign assets. Revenues are generally stable while price is steady because the host country needs expertise and capital that they don't have. However, when price jumps, the host country thinks foreigners are making too much from the national treasure, and accordingly reneges on the contract, raises taxes (often retroactively), or both. Russia, Venezuela and Bolivia are recent cases in point. So, the investor may (or may not) retain his investment, but does not share in the price increase. And, it is anticipation of price increases that attracts po believers to oil and gas investments in the first place.
Regarding gas, the current NA overhang caused by last year's warm winter has held storage at record levels, and the record looks to continue through the first week of Nov, usually the last week that gas is added, and maybe througout the winter unless significantly colder than usual. As a futures contract moves towards the front, it comes face to face with real supply and demand vis a vis the spot market, at which point it has, for months now, crumbled. Futures players are still thinking that gas and oil are bound by their traditional relationship based on heat value. However, the record storage, combined with the ongoing departure from the US of fertilizer and plastics precursor manufacturers, is causing a rolling crash of gas prices. There may be a crash in NA production in a few years, but profits will be under high stress for several quarters. Meanwhile, long investors in gas futures contracts have been losing money quite steadily since the first of the year, and imo this will continue for some time.
- There will not be a windfall profits tax while bush is president. After he leaves, there may be a change in taxes, but with US reserves running out, no tax will focus on e&p's looking to develop old fields or find new ones. Of course there will be market wide sell offs - thre have been three since I began investing in e&p's eighteen months ago, the shoulder seasons are dangerous. That is what volatility means - however, as long as the long-term direction of oil prices is up, these companies will continue increasing profits; I simply stay in because timing is too tough. Regarding US vs foreign - the last 1% from the old fields might fetch as much as the first 99%, and represent more profits to boot, which is the main point, and meanwhile there is no risk of nationalization. The majors have no choice - they produce so much that they must replace their older, labor-intensive US fields with foreign ones. However, the majors are not as profitable as the small e&p's (I measure this as net/production), and, equally important, are not growing reserves as are a few small ones.
- Policymakers aren't doing much one way or the other anyway, the question is, what are investors, or e&p's for that matter, to do while gas price remains soft? Some investors will move away (like me), some will hold, few new investors will buy into gas right now, so shares will ease back and become a buy at some point in the future as we get closer to where prices reverse to the upside, maybe sharply (my moving away from gas is timing, not my strong point, will see if I get it right this time). E&P's will carry on in a more difficult environment because they have expenses to pay, maybe not contracting for quite so many rigs (85% of us rigs are looking for gas), freeing up some rigs to look for oil.
Hurricanes did not take that much gas off production, we still entered last winter with a very comfortable storage, higher than the five-year avg. THere was never a time when storage justified last winter's record prices... this was a case of market irrationality, maybe hedge funds pushing too hard. There is no chance we will not have a record amount in storage, my guess is we will add at least the avg of the past ten years thru the first week of nov, usually the last week that storage is added, meaning storage will climb from the current 2905 to 3725. I see the front month dropping to around 6/mcf every month through next summer... and, even at these lower prices, fertilizer and plastics precursor manufacturers cannot compete with foreign suppliers closer to cheap cas, not least qatar, so the us is quickly shedding around 20% of gas demand as we move to import more of our energy needs.