Question about Natural gas wells.
 Can the extraction rate of natural gas be regulated on a new well?

The reason i ask is that if it can be regulated, then it can be reduced substantially or even stopped so as to keep it stored in the ground. Then there would be no need to flare it off.

This is called capping. The problem for producers is that most of their costs are fixed, so it is a disaster to shut down production.  Production usually continues even when prices are too low to make profits because of the desperate need for revenue.  However, when storage is full, there is nowhere for buers to put the gas, so in this case at least some producers must cap or flare, probably those who are distant from major pipelines and must pay a premium to transport their gas.

Why flare? because raw gas contains valuable non gas liquids, and these liquids can be separated and sold for at least a little revenue even as the gas is flared.  Flaring used to be a widespread practice... maybe we'll see this again if a few procuders get desperate enough.

  The extraction rate of natural gas can be regulated by either changing to a smaller orifice on the wellhead (hole that lets the gas out) or by shutting in the production. Since Natural Gas has almost always been in oversupply in the US, all oil and gas leases-the contract with the mineral owners-allow for shut-in periods by the producers
   Flaring ended as a normal practice in the 1960'sn the US, but some producers flare gas overseas because no market exists and they lack the wells and equipment for reinjection.

Lots of the new gas wells are unconventional gas from shale and coal bed methane. They produce a lot of water because of the huge frac jobs. Does anybody know whether the watre will cause formation damage on a shut-in well?  

thank you both for your inputs. I just learned yesterday, i will be getting a well put on my property in north west Louisiana. (Hence my curiosity about NG) There is mostly natural gas wells around that area, so i imagine the drilling co will be extracting natural gas. needless to say, i am smiling!
That's really great news for you. With modern geophysics, about 2/3rds of wells are economic successes And, what kind of money is better than royalty? It arrives in yourmailbox without having to work for it, and its tax-advantaged. I hope they make a real barn-burner!
thanks, and the royalties will pay for my daughters' college, she's studying Geology.
typical coalbed methane wells produce water because the coal is saturated with water   the water is produced to allow a pressure decline in the coal and allow desorption of the gas from the coal  if a coal well is shut in the desorption will stop and water will need to be produced so that desorption can again take place   so no it is not practical to shut in a coal bed methane well
Thanks elwoodelmore, thats what I figured. I'm guessing  that the shale gas wells will also have problems if any of the frac water is left in the reservoir. It will be a real problem for producers because the pipelines don't generally allow a producer to decide which wells to shut in, its based on market conditions.

Yes, natural gas wells are very easy to control, and that is why production figures do not tell the complete story.  Also, gas drillers can take option on tracts and then just wait to drill it (this is happening out west right now) so you can't assume that just because the gas is not being drilled, it is not there.

The idea of "flaring" natural gas in this day and age is absolutely barbaric.

Roger Conner  known to you as ThatsItImout

  Flaring is only done while drilling or completingon some wells in the US, or to get rid of H2S or other poisons while refining. Nobody throws away money on purpose, except oilceo's paramour, Paris Hilton or Haliburton on a cost plus govt. contract.(I'm just kidding about Paris, I'm sure her moderation is only exceded by her taste and modesty)
  In Oil and Gas Lease contracts the mineral owners can prevent flaring by requiring the producer to pay for all flared gas at the market price.