Gets IT

I share your sentiments not Irvings.

My reason for posting the link was to show that the "Freedom of the Press" is routinely censored either by law or voluntarily; for reasons of decorum, politics, historic legacy or even domestic tranquility.

To say this cartoon episode is an exercise in freedom is nonsense. It's at least profiteering and possibly incitement. On all sides!

Would any main stream publication in America reprint scurilous cartoons -- printed in Denmark -- of say, Martin Luther King and purport to be acting in solidarity with press freedoms?

No worries. I got it. I'm just offering the rest of the folks another <this time extreme> example to over-emphisize how unfair treatment is and on how sensitive the west manages to be towards Jewish concerns when totally ignoring those of Islam, or IMHO even worse, as treating Islamic indignity as complete nonsense and totally of no reasonable concern or possibe consequence as they ask where their sense of humor is. They do nothing when an insult is hurled towards Islam, but arrest this guy and give him 3 years for simplying denying the Holocaust existed. I'm constantly amazed at the inconsistancies of western law and the ease of convenience in how it can be perverted, twisted and turned and applied so unequally. Where is integrity? Certainly not in western law.
Fallacy of questionable analogy. Irving was trying Orwellian changing of history. The cartoon printed in Denmark had a legitimate satirical purpose in pointing out the GREAT TRUTH that terrorisim is an utter and complete and 100% perversion of Islam.