<Tuesday Open Thread.... The Oil Drum US Port Security and the United Arab Emirates>

45 comments on The Denver gas situation

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Gets IT on February 22, 2006 - 10:44am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
He's right then.  I never heard of Xcel. I left the USA in 1990 and there's been a lot of takeovers since then, but I do remember Colorado Interstate Gas and most of their immediate supply wells were in the Tx-Ok panhandles and SW Kansas.  Those were the old gathering systems in which I was trying to turn one around to supply a proposed peak generator in Larime Co.  They were some producing wells still left around that particular area, but they were on their last breath 16 years ago and were running at about 30-40% N2, so even then they wern't what you would call star performers.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Gets IT on February 22, 2006 - 12:08pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
But he's still wrong about having hundreds of glycol treaters.  There's only a couple of those per field.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
kkinder on February 22, 2006 - 12:19pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Xcel used to be called Public Service Company.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Gets IT on February 22, 2006 - 12:25pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
The only XL that I heard about before was Microsoft's.  I'm surprized they don't sue Excel for some name infrigement violations.-)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.

45 comments on The Denver gas situation

Comments can no longer be added to this story.