David Goodstein doesn't think we have hundreds of years' worth of coal:

It's possible for us to revert either to natural gas or to coal or both. Among consequences are the increasing global climate change. But another consequence is, let us suppose you tried to substitute coal for oil. Natural gas is a good substitute and it will last for a while but it will have its own peak one or two decades after oil, so it's only a temporary solution. If you turn to coal, we're now using twice as much energy from oil as we are from coal. So if you want to liquefy coal as a substitute for oil in transportation--which is its most important application--you would have to mine coal at a rate that's many, many times at the rate of what we're doing now. But the conversion process is very inefficient. So you'd have to mine much more than that. If you put that together with the growing world population and the fact that the rest of the world wants to increase its standard of living, you realize that the estimates that say we have hundreds of years worth of coal in the ground are wrong by a factor of ten or more. So we will run out of all fossil fuels. Coal will peak just like any natural resource. We will reach the peak for all fossil fuels by the end of the century.
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how much longer the coal will last -- all that matters is that it will last longer than the oil. Once you've eaten the leaves, you go for the bark.

Oil and and gas are near perfect fuels for transportation and heating. But of these two, oil is more fundamental to our economy - if for no other reason than the military machine runs on oil. But there are other reasons: the whole suburban way of life, the whole country in other words, turns in a big pile of junk. So, CTL is the only way to go for those who are unwilling to make significant changes in our way of life. Ha! I just contradicted myself - correction: for those who are unwilling to see a drastic asset devaluation.

My daughter lives in W. Va., although the eastern part. In the western part, there's already a huge movement opposing removing mountain tops. When one considers the (low) energy density of coal and the conversion loss, and then figures out what it will take to replace any significant fraction our current oil budget, well, I can't begin to imagine what the future will be like. But next time I go down, I'm going to visit western W Va -- visit the future.

Oh, I don't doubt we'll go with coal.  So will China, Russia, and any other countries that have coal reserves.  I'm just saying I doubt we have hundreds of years' worth.  Not if we start using coal to run our cars.    

But I do wonder if we'll be able to build the infrastructure in time to do that.  It's going to be much harder as energy gets pricier.  We may not be able to scale up in time to keep the American way of life going for even a few decades longer.  The wealthy will still be driving, I'm sure, but only the wealthy driving is not enough to support the highway system.