What concerns me is that synfuel plants require steel in large quantities. We don't have a steel industry that can ramp up quickly anymore. We need all the accessory bits as well as blast furnaces, too. We need to build the plants to build the steel mills to build the synfuel industry. Figure on five years, minimum. That's assuming we have a coordinated national program with at least price rationing of critical path equipment and resources. Just building the coal industry up to the level of synfuel capability is going to be a huge job.
China has a much larger steel industry than we do and so synfuels are a simple problem for them. They even export coal. In the case of oil cuttoff from the Gulf they are much better placed to succeed then we are. Look at them as being about eighteen months from imported crude based fuel replacement at any given time.
Bush, Jr, did attempt to put a tariff/quota on steel imports before he got overrun. It wasn't much of an effort.
Very good point; here in Minnesota we still have plenty of taconite (relatively low-grade iron ore, but abundant) but it would take some time to, say double, output. Also, I suspect the equipment and skills needed to get at tar sands are very similar to those needed to get the taconite out of the ground and made into pellets (which BTW are the best free slingshot ammo ever made IMO and available for the picking up along rail beds).

Also, where would we get the ore carriers and the freight cars needed to double output?

Hm, maybe I should buy another couple hundred pounds of rice and oatmeal . . . .

There are PERT charts that could be made about this...
Some things can be done in parallel, for instance, you could build a tube mill for pipe and at the same time be holding classes for welders so that when the tube mill was built, the welders would be ready to weld it into a synfuel plant. Ditto building roads to make coal mines able to get the coal to the railroad spur being built at the same time.
But some things have to be done in serial. Like first you find a mineral deposit, then you analyse it from electrical, magnetic, gravity, and seismic surveys, then you core drill anywhere interesting, then if it is indeed interesting (ie, the surveys gave you a clue about the rock, the core told you if the anomaly you were measuring was what you thought it was), then  you grid drill to find out if it's big and rich and friable enough (the mineral not only has to be there, it has to be recoverable after you grind it), then you grid drill to find out where you should start digging first, then you start digging and laying in the rail spur and building the smelter or whatever. A crash program to build a mine is five years. Usually it takes twenty if everything goes right. That's not a joke, that's the way it is.
Building a synfuel plant is a comparative cinch. Building a windmill farm or a solar field is even simpler.
In Minnesota at one time we had many of the finest mining engineers and geologists in the world working on the iron ranges (There are actually 3 of them.). These guys mapped out in great detail where the ore is, how much, and how good. For example, under the town of Bovey in Minnesota is a fair amount of good ore: To get at it all you would have to do is remove the town. But there is plenty of taconite, and the technology of getting at it is pretty simple, and so I do not think it would take strip mining long to get restarted--were it not for bottlenecks in big tires, rail cars, ore boats and possibly [don't know] seamen and officers to man those ore boats.

The ships are huge, and navigating on Lake Superior in bad weather is not something you want to do with 90-Day Wonders.