Regarding the location of generation plant, given that thermal generation using a steam cycle (coal, gas, nuclear, oil, bio-mass, waste incineration etc) accounts for the vast majority of electricity generation and is likely to for decades to come the plant should be as close to consumers as possible.  These thermal plants waste two thirds of the heat output up the chimneys and cooling towers (only(!) half for CCGTs).  This waste heat should be reused in district heat and power systems thus increasing the efficiency from ~30% to more like ~80% requiring the plant to be local.

There are pollution issues with large scale combustion close to population centres but `technology' can go a long way to clean the kinds of pollutants that local populations is concerned with.  City centre nuclear plant is unlikely to be popular neither is nuclear district heating though it is used in Russia.

Interestingly, I think as we move into the post peak scarcity, attitudes toward living next to a generating plant will change, viewing them as a community asset rather than blight.

This is the new Combined Cycle Plant in my old neighborhood of Astoria.

I can't remember where I read it (Big Gav? Sustainablog?), but someone recently discussed a report which said that having wind turbines within 2 miles of your home caused stress, sleeplessness, irritability, etc from the noise that they produce.

Well, look, NYC is already so freaking noisy, how much more can turbines add? I say we should stick some mini-turbines right in the middles of our streets! The large-building-wind-tunnel effect is so powerful that I bet we can generate tons of wind power, and we'll never notice the extra noise.

(OK, I might be kidding, but honestly, I wonder if they really would make a difference in a landscape that's already really noisy.)

Hey, it might just add a little white noise to drown out the rest of the urban soundscape.

Here's an Artist's sketch (pre 9-11) of urban windmills