![]() | Credit investors ponder GM-sized hole in universe | The Oil Drum | Daylight Savings - A drop in the Oil Drum? | ![]() |
198 comments on Wednesday Open Thread (and News Dump)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
198 comments on Wednesday Open Thread (and News Dump)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- US Housing and the Passive Home Standard
- Passive Solar Design Overview – Part 1
- Radical Retrenchment - A Reference Model
TOD:Europe
- Energy Policy: SER-2 [01] Introduction
- The Russian Bear?
- The Permanent Oil Crisis Conference in Amsterdam, January 21 & 22, 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 9th January 2009
- 2009: Predictions for Australia
- The Bullroarer - Tuesday 6th January 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Heading Out
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
Re: Watching the Import Numbers
Last week, average daily oil imports into the US rebounded slightly to 10.1 mbpd, but the average for March, 2006 (9.9 mbpd) was down about 4% from the average for March, 2005 (10.3 mbpd).
There is always the possibility of statistical variations, but the concerns that Khebab and I have about net export capacity are based on the Hubbert Linearization (HL) method--which accurately predicted 99% of the post-1970 cumulative Lower 48 oil production. Therefore, if the HL method is screaming problems ahead for net export capacity, and if average daily imports into the US for March are down about 4%, year over year, I think that we need to sit up and take notice.
I predict explosive increases in oil prices.
The "Export Land" Model:
A critical point to keep in mind is that an exporter can only export what is left after domestic consumption is satisfied. Consider a simple example, a country producing 2.0 mbpd, consuming 1.0 mbpd and therefore exporting 1.0 mbpd. Let's assume a 25% drop in production over a six year period (which we have seen in the North Sea, which by the way peaked at 52% of Qt) and let's assume a 10% increase in domestic consumption. Production would be 1.5 mbpd. Consumption would be 1.1 mbpd. Net exports would be production (1.5 mbpd) less consumption (1.1 mbpd) = 0.4 mbpd. Therefore, because of a 25% drop in production and because of a 10% increase in domestic consumption, net oil exports from our hypothetical net exporter dropped by 60%, from 1.0 mbpd to 0.4 mbpd, over a six year period.
Note that car sales in Russia are up 15% year over year.
No one knows for sure because no one tracks inventories on the basis of quality, but the price spread between light, sweet and heavy, sour is certainly suggesting a falling light sweet supply.
I thought that is was generally accepted thet we passed "Peak Light Sweet Oil" in either 2000/2001 (statistical tie) or 2004 (depending upon how "light" is Light).
So today, increasing heavy and/or sour crude, decreasing light sweey crude. Question is, are heavy/sour increases larger or smaller than light sweet decreases ?
Yesterday oil rose because of the drop of gasoline inventories (by 5 mln.barrels), even though the oil inventories are on the rise again (by 2 mln.barrels).
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/markets/energy.html
Second, and more importantly - worldwide there is a shortage of capacity, capable of processing heavy/sour crude. And a lot of refineries are upgrading now. It is possible that a lot of the piled up sour/heavy crude is simply waiting for somebody who is able to process it.
The result of both things is that oil inventories would rise, but there will be shortage on finished products.
IMPORTS go down:

DEMAND goes up:

STOCKPILES go down:

What more do you need?
The more important question I was trying to answer is why gasoline production and imports are dropping even though oil stocks are on all times high? The relation between sour/heavy and light sweet crude could be the answer.
Now that's an explanation.
The last few weeks of threads about oil prices and futures markets has got me thinking about what I should do when we have the next oil spike. At what price point should I start thinking about increasing my food/supply reserves. Here's my general breakdown for the cost of a barrel of oil (assuming I wake up tomorrow and there has been a terrorist attack that knocks out supply for an unknown amount of time but probably at least 1 month) :
$100-Go to Costco on the way home. Increase food supply by one month.
$150-Go to Costco on the way to work. Buy non-perishables. Go back on the way home to get frozen stuff if it seems necessary.
$200-Go straight to Costco; buy everything we can get our hands on.
Am I overreacting? Will $200/barrel cripple the economy? Seems like that would be about $6/gal gasoline?
If I am wrong, you will have less debt, with a lower stress lifestyle and you will have more money in the bank. If I am right, you will at least be better prepared.
George Ure, over at Urban Survival, has PDF essay that you can purchase for $10 on "How to live on $10,000 or less per year." (I have nothing to do with his website/publishing efforts, and I'm sure there's tons of similar stuff out there). George's #1 recommendation is to arrange your life so that you can get by without a car.
But when the hurricanes come, FEMA will not be there to move you out in time. Curses!
And I keep a car for evac, but drive only ~180 miles/month.
In the richer European countries it is the American lifestyle everyone wants. Bigger houses and bigger cars and increased enegry use. In our lane every adult has a car. Houses are getting bigger too. Bathrooms and kitchens are growing bigger. As people get richer they spend more and more. A rough rule of thumb is that people seem to buy the biggest house and the biggest car, they can possibly afford. They seem to believe that providence has granted them a life of luxury and hapiness, which is somehow their birthright, because our civilization is morally superior to all others.