(Also just posted on end of last open discussion).

Re:  Watching the Import Numbers

Last week,  average daily oil imports into the US rebounded slightly to 10.1 mbpd, but the average for March, 2006 (9.9 mbpd) was down about 4% from the average for March, 2005 (10.3 mbpd).  

There is always the possibility of statistical variations, but the concerns that Khebab and I have about net export capacity are based on the Hubbert Linearization (HL) method--which accurately predicted 99% of the post-1970 cumulative Lower 48 oil production.    Therefore, if the HL method is screaming problems ahead for net export capacity, and if average daily imports into the US for March are down about 4%, year over year, I think that we need to sit up and take notice.

I predict explosive increases in oil prices.

The "Export Land" Model:

 A critical point to keep in mind is that an exporter can only export what is left after domestic consumption is satisfied. Consider a simple example, a country producing 2.0 mbpd, consuming 1.0 mbpd and therefore exporting 1.0 mbpd. Let's assume a 25% drop in production over a six year period (which we have seen in the North Sea, which by the way peaked at 52% of Qt) and let's assume a 10% increase in domestic consumption. Production would be 1.5 mbpd. Consumption would be 1.1 mbpd. Net exports would be production (1.5 mbpd) less consumption (1.1 mbpd) = 0.4 mbpd. Therefore, because of a 25% drop in production and because of a 10% increase in domestic consumption, net oil exports from our hypothetical net exporter dropped by 60%, from 1.0 mbpd to 0.4 mbpd, over a six year period.

Note that car sales in Russia are up 15% year over year.

Note that it is quite likely that light sweet crude as percentage of total imports has dropped from March, 2005 to March, 2006.  

No one knows for sure because no one tracks inventories on the basis of quality, but the price spread between light, sweet and heavy, sour is certainly suggesting a falling light sweet supply.

> ...falling light sweet crude supply

I thought that is was generally accepted thet we passed "Peak Light Sweet Oil" in either 2000/2001 (statistical tie) or 2004 (depending upon how "light" is Light).

So today, increasing heavy and/or sour crude, decreasing light sweey crude. Question is, are heavy/sour increases larger or smaller than light sweet decreases ?

It seems unreal, but no one tracks inventories on the basis of quality.  For all we know, 100% of the build in inventories year over year has been heavy, sour.  My theory is that a continuing build in heavy, sour inventories is obscuring falling inventories of light, sweet.
Maybe this is the underlying explanation why we are at long in oil inventories, but getting tighter on gasoline.

Yesterday oil rose because of the drop of gasoline inventories (by 5 mln.barrels), even though the oil inventories are on the rise again (by 2 mln.barrels).

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/markets/energy.html

How does that explain anything?
First, AFAIK more heavy/sour oil is needed to produce a unit of gasoline - hence the oil inventories may need to rise slightly to reflect that.

Second, and more importantly - worldwide there is a shortage of capacity, capable of processing heavy/sour crude. And a lot of refineries are upgrading now. It is possible that a lot of the piled up sour/heavy crude is simply waiting for somebody who is able to process it.

The result of both things is that oil inventories would rise, but there will be shortage on finished products.

Can I make this any simplier?  How about charts from the current This Week In Petroleum

IMPORTS go down:

DEMAND goes up:

STOCKPILES go down:

What more do you need?

You are missing the domestic production variable in the equation. My guess is that it will also be down.

The more important question I was trying to answer is why gasoline production and imports are dropping even though oil stocks are on all times high? The relation between sour/heavy and light sweet crude could be the answer.

Maybe it's just a refinery issue?  It's the time of year when they're switching over to summer blends.  Plus that Amerada Hess refinery was offline last week due to technical difficulties.
MTBE?  HA!

Assessment needed before restart in Niger Delta -oil

... The companies also are calling for sustainable peace in Nigeria's Niger Delta, where attacks by militant youths have cut the country's oil output by about 641,000 barrels a day, out of a daily output of 2.4 million b/d. ...


Now that's an explanation.
"I predict explosive increases in oil prices."

The last few weeks of threads about oil prices and futures markets has got me thinking about what I should do when we have the next oil spike.  At what price point should I start thinking about increasing my food/supply reserves.  Here's my general breakdown for the cost of a barrel of oil (assuming I wake up tomorrow and there has been a terrorist attack that knocks out supply for an unknown amount of time but probably at least 1 month) :

$100-Go to Costco on the way home.  Increase food supply by one month.
$150-Go to Costco on the way to work.  Buy non-perishables.  Go back on the way home to get frozen stuff if it seems necessary.
$200-Go straight to Costco; buy everything we can get our hands on.

Am I overreacting?  Will $200/barrel cripple the economy?  Seems like that would be about $6/gal gasoline?

In my Peak Oil presentations, I advise everyone to try to:  (1) reduce the commute between home and work to as close to zero as possible; (2)  arrange your life so that you can live off 50% of your current income, or less; (3)  look into organic gardening and/or consider buying (perhaps with a group of people) a small organic farm (if nothing else, you can lease it out to an organic farmer) and (4) support local agriculture.   You should strive toward being a net producer of food and/or energy, starting with energy conservation measures.

If I am wrong, you will have less debt, with a lower stress lifestyle and you will have more money in the bank.  If I am right, you will at least be better prepared.  

George Ure, over at Urban Survival, has PDF essay that you can purchase for $10 on "How to live on $10,000 or less per year."  (I have nothing to do with his website/publishing efforts, and I'm sure there's tons of similar stuff out there).  George's #1 recommendation is to arrange your life so that you can get by without a car.

I think the advice about getting along without a car is sound. I ditched my old, restored and beloved Volvo with six huge cylinders and a 350 horsepower engine. Owning it was like burning money for fun. When I bought it gas was cheap. From the day brought it home gas prices just seemed to go up and up and up. I think Fate was trying to tell me something. Parting with it was sorrowful, but necessary. Anyway, my daughters didn't really appriciate the G-force pressing them back into their seats, when I touched the accelerator of "The Beast", as we called it. We now have dull, but wonderfully practical and incredibly realiable Toyota which we don't really use all that much. We also live in small port on coast, with a railway station, a ferry, a bus link, and lots of sailing boats. So as far as alternative transport possibilities go, we are very fortunate. I'm glad oil prices went up when they did, because I had been toying with the idea of buying Mercedes with around 475 horsepower for some odd reason. Today I would be feeling very foolish and rather ashamed if I'd followed through on this bizarre idea.
getting by without a car is a tremendous relief on the wallet. imagine, the money saved: no car note, no gasoline costs, no automotive maintenance, at $65 an hr on labor, no need for car insurance, and lastly no need for vehicle registration or safety inspections. it all adds up! Plus the cleaner air.
But when the hurricanes come, FEMA will not be there to move you out in time. Curses!
One reason that I live in New Orleans is that I can live reasonably well on $1,000/month when I hit a dry period.  Less if I need to.

And I keep a car for evac, but drive only ~180 miles/month.

When I drove through Eastern Europe a couple of years ago one of the things that struck me was the number of newly-built car showrooms. It was amazing. It seemed like everybody wanted a new car. Everyone wants a lifestyle like the Americans have and who can really blame them for wanting luxury and comfort. After all, this is the ideology we sold them for decades. Cast off socialism and collectivism and you too can live like us. California is waiting for you all on a silver platter.

In the richer European countries it is the American lifestyle everyone wants. Bigger houses and bigger cars and increased enegry use. In our lane every adult has a car. Houses are getting bigger too. Bathrooms and kitchens are growing bigger. As people get richer they spend more and more. A rough rule of thumb is that people seem to buy the biggest house and the biggest car, they can possibly afford. They seem to believe that providence has granted them a life of luxury and hapiness, which is somehow their birthright, because our civilization is morally superior to all others.