Amen, peakguy. Bottled water is nothing but trouble.
The study said that demand for bottled water soared in developing countries between 1999 and 2004 with consumption tripling in India and more than doubling in China during that period.

That has translated into massive costs in packaging the water, usually in plastic bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) which is derived from crude oil, and then transporting it by boat, train or on land.

"Making bottles to meet Americans' demand for bottled water requires more than 1.5 million barrels of oil annually, enough to fuel some 100,000 US cars for a year," according to the study. "Worldwide, some 2.7 million tons of plastic are used to bottle water each year."

Once the water is consumed, disposing the plastic bottles poses an environmental risk.

loved the story, but adored the picture
That IS a great photo. She must have about 15-20 cases of water there.
Note that they are all single serving size bottles.  Long live individualism!
And in a Sprawlmart buggy, no less!  Awesome find.
This is the kind of thing you see all up and down the coast when a hurricane warning gets posted. Many residents have wells, not city service, and the power always goes out. And can stay out for quite a while.

So you fill your bathtub to flush the toilet. You fill your your biggest cooking pots for drinking water... some head to the store and buy it, but they are usually not native residents. They are transplants who don't know the real drill.

Bottled water use in the US is a different issue than bottled water use in developing countries.  One of the primary factors in poverty in the underdeveloped world is lack of access to clean water.  In those places, bottled water is neccessary.

Like many of you I grew up in a time where bottled water was a luxury and not something I ever drank.  The first time I travelled to China, I was shocked that mt company had free bottled water stocked in the break room, like we have free coffee here.  It seemed so odd to me that I kept one as a momento.  I took me a while to realize it wasn't a luxury, it was a healthy neccessity.

and with bottled water, tooth-decay is supposedly going up again.  Sanitized water for bottling has neither the fluoride that we've added to many water supplies, nor many of the natural trace minerals that come from tap water.. this also happens to some extent with 'brita' style filtering, you throw out the good minerals with the bad ones.

Some solutions are in the offing, though it doesn't help the forementioned packaging waste, the leachates from plastic softeners, or the issues (In Maine at least) of sending millions of gallons from our water tables out of state as private (and largely untaxed) property.

http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/business/14456505.htm

bob

"and with bottled water, tooth-decay is supposedly going up again.  Sanitized water for bottling has neither the fluoride that we've added to many water supplies, nor many of the natural trace minerals that come from tap water.. this also happens to some extent with 'brita' style filtering, you throw out the good minerals with the bad ones."

  I hope that you are better informed about "oil/fuels" than about water.  Fluoride is the worst thing that anyone could be placing in their water.
  The minerals in the water are not used by the body anyway.  The only pure water available today is distilled water; filtered water is nothing but a joke stay away from ice cubes that come from ice machines with water filters.

"Some solutions are in the offing, though it doesn't help the forementioned packaging waste, the leachates from plastic softeners, or the issues (In Maine at least) of sending millions of gallons from our water tables out of state as private (and largely untaxed) property."

  Bottled water is necessary in many cases and besides it provides a lot of people with jobs.  At a number of schools here in the state of WA there are stores of bottled water; our big deal is earthquakes ... and plastic bottles are much, much, much better than glass; I would not refer to it as "packaing waste."

Proof;
  There is still some controversy about adding fluoride to water supplies, but it has been an enormous success given the state of our dietary and other healthcare and economic realities in the US.

"The American Dental Association, the federal Centers for Disease Control and state government have endorsed the practice of fluoridating public water at 1 part per million for nearly 50 years to combat tooth decay in a safe, cost-effective manner.
Massachusetts officials supplied The Standard-Times with one study that shows the effectiveness of fluoridation on children's teeth. There are hundreds of studies from across the country that compare children who drink water without fluoride to those who drink fluoridated water.
The 1981 study by the Harvard University School of Dental Medicine and state Department of Dental Care Administration looked at 231 children ages 7 to 14 who grew up with fluoridated water in 1981 in Holyoke and a similar group of children who were screened in the same Holyoke schools in 1968 before the community added fluoride to its water.
The researchers found that among young boys and girls there was a 72 percent reduction in tooth decay, as measured through cavities, missing teeth and other signs of decay.
Comparisons of nonfluoridated and fluoridated communities in the United States, Australia, Britain, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of water fluoridation in reducing decay, according to the CDC. The reduction in dental decay ranged from 15 percent to 40 percent in these studies.
With this kind of results, it is understandable that the directors of New Bedford's anti-poverty agency, PACE, made a request several years ago to the New Bedford Board of Health to add fluoride to city water to help children and adults, and particularly to reach poor children who do not have good dental care at home through regular brushing or at a dentist's office through regular visits. "

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-06/05-04-06/01opinion.htm

As far as our bodies 'not using' the minerals in water, ..please.  Regular drinking water doesn't carry the volumes of Calcium or Magnesium that we NEED every day, compared to what 'should' be in our food, but if it's there in solution in the small intestine, it will get picked over, and Ca and Mg aren't the only minerals we need.  

In the case of emergency water rations, who could argue with whatever Wa. has pulled together? Sure.. But the argument is about the ridiculous volumes of throwaway bottles that clog our solid waste streams and throw away precious feed-stocks in one-use containers. (Even recycled, that plastic has maybe two degraded uses to go, before its tossed.  Glass, or a reusable water-bottle could go on for years.  I hope the schools have at least stocked up in large, reusable water-cooler tanks, and not just cases of 'handi-paks'.. we've convinced ourselves that these conveniences are absolutely life/death necessities.

Just a reminder that the trade in illegal drugs also provides many people with jobs, as does the manufacture of Hummers.
Providing people with jobs is not, and never has been, a valid arguement to continue engaging in some wasteful or detrimental practice.
Wouldn't fluoride in toothpaste suffice?
Actually, I grew up with well water that was not fluoridated. When I moved to NYC, the first thing the dental hygienist asked me was whether I grew up drinking well water, because people with as many cavities as I have often didn't drink fluoridated water. (That's not to say that you can't otherwise have lots of cavities, but there's a strong correlation according to her.)

Toothpaste actually is not as good as we might want it to be—many places that don't have fluoridated water give kids fluoride pills.