Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Passive Solar Design Overview – Part 1
- Radical Retrenchment - A Reference Model
- TOD:Campfire RSS feed
TOD:Europe
- Energy Policy: SER-2 [01] Introduction
- The Russian Bear?
- The Permanent Oil Crisis Conference in Amsterdam, January 21 & 22, 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 9th January 2009
- 2009: Predictions for Australia
- The Bullroarer - Tuesday 6th January 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Heading Out
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
What the heck is this "grin" shit? Aren't you guys supposed to be posing as serious analysts? Is this an IRC channel?
And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
The tone of my post was way out of line. Sorry.
It's just that you used the same expression twice in an earlier article and I lost it for a second.
http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/8/16/13213/1413#more
It certainly is a very relaxed style. But if there is no intent to reach a wide main stream audience, not a problem.
For the record, I'm not to be taken seriously. (As if there was any danger of that).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A9rotrain
I thought it was great. Much more economical. Not sure why the aerotrain was abandoned for the maglev. I guess politicians like to fund pie-in-the-sky technologies instead of something simple.
It may be the 2 barrels/acre/day of production statement?
You know in order to not be considered an IRC channel, comments and critics need to be well stated also. We need to be more fact based in our statements. If you go to the cellulosic ethanol thread, you will see lots of questions and idea exchanged on the possibility of biodiesel from algae.
As for taking us seriously, It will be harder for me to take you seriously if you cannot articulate something more accuratly. Credibility is obtained trough good communication and comprehension. For having good communication, real physical presence is needed. Nevertheless, the kind of interaction in a blog allow for a certain amount of good communication, albeit less optimal, more efficient for reaching a large number of people. For attaining that kind of credibility, please write clearer messages and use better language.
I like the idea but after seeing little movement from the proponents at UNH I want to see more in the way of data, working examples, all the little caveats which factor into all real systems, etc.
Nonsense, no matter how cheap you can make the manufacturing oil from alge process it will never be as cheap as just finding in in the ground and pulling it out.
"supposed to be posing"
supposed to be posing
And you mean exactly what with such a statement?
supposed
accepted as true but doubtful: accepted, at least by some, as correct, real, or having a quality, but on slender or uncertain evidence
posing
2 : to affect an attitude or character usually to deceive or impress
Are you doubting the acting ability of Heading Out to be a serious analyst?
What was your point?
I think we both nailed him shut. If it would have been in gheto street talk, it wouldnt have been better.
I didnt read or notice other useful comment from him, but I may have just missed them, who knows?