303 comments on DrumBeat: September 6, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
303 comments on DrumBeat: September 6, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Passive Solar Design Overview – Part 1
- Radical Retrenchment - A Reference Model
- TOD:Campfire RSS feed
TOD:Europe
- Energy Policy: SER-2 [01] Introduction
- The Russian Bear?
- The Permanent Oil Crisis Conference in Amsterdam, January 21 & 22, 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 9th January 2009
- 2009: Predictions for Australia
- The Bullroarer - Tuesday 6th January 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Heading Out
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
"An opportunity like this only comes once every few decades," said Daniel Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates in Massachusetts.
So that's it chaps - no more discoveries until the 2030s.
On a more serious note, the official releases by Chevron, Devon and Statoil do not mention reserves. The discussion about "reserves" is not for the Jack prospect but is a guestimate for the whole of this deep water play based on press interviews.
The fact that the field was discovered last year, the well test just reported was conducted during the second quarter of 2006 - does leave me wondering about the timing of this press release - and the media hype surrounding it.
On a different topic, this link goes to the oil market update by Clive Maund - for those who like technical analysis.
http://321energy.com/editorials/maund/maund090706.html
I went on to point out if it were on the high end at 15, & we were able to MAX it flat out, then we would use it up in less than 2 yrs. He quickly understood how little this is in the BIG picture.
He thanked me for pointing out the discrepancy and started asking questions. I told him to google peak oil and choose where he wants to start. He wrote it down and I hope to talk to him tomorrow night and see if he followed through. Demonstrate your knowledge in a non condescending way to people and they'll do all the talking for you.
I introduced a very good friend of mine to the ideas and lent him a copy of End of Suburbia. His wife scolded me for turning him into a worried doomer (not her phrase), and eventually he turned to a 'negotiator' which means he looked inside himself and found faith in ethanol, although in general he has just put the whole issue out of his mind, so I don't bring it up any more.
Last semester we had a debate in our brand new auditorium for legalizing cannabis and the high times editor stopped in to argue for while we had a retired DEA agent against. I'm currently trying to organize a peak oil debate in this same vein to stir debate among my college. I've started asking around as to WHO could organize this since I just want to get it started rather than be in it. It's my last year so I kind of want to do something since I've taken all this information on PO in and truly appreciate the seriousness and dire circumstances we will be facing without action at all levels.
Any one of my parents age and up, won't buy it. I know there are plenty of you here, but you're able to think independently and actually examine facts rather than advertising and marketing.
Do you ever wonder why we consume so much? After taking some marketing courses I've come to the firm belief it's marketing's fault. They are THAT good at what they do. They use what we've learned from modern Psychology and used it to push the right buttons (hmmm...just like a robot). Ralph Nader warned against consumerism and he is looking more and more right.
I'm 29 and father of two young boys. My wife is fairly accepting that we just don't know what lurks around the corner. I've told her I'm a doomer. She gets it. She's less interested in making changes and more interested in enjoying the time we've got. Like Dan Ur said, "Have fun, and do what you need to do to have fun and stay as sane as you want to, and don't worry about it."
I've laid it all out for my parents as well (they are in their late fifties). They logically understand it all. They understand the arguments for peak oil, global warming, overshoot, etc. However, they are not interested in subscribing to it. My dad is an engineer, my mom a public health officer. They are bright people. But I think their experience has been that of better returns each year, with the prospect of improvement each year. They have been told that life can only get better. This is a message they've heard since they were babies, and it continues to be a strong message that they are receptive to. There have been few experiences in their lives to refute this prospect.
I don't want to make this an essay on age-ism, because that is short-sighted and without merit. There are plenty of baby-boomers involved in the debate, with voices on each side of the issue.
But I can identify with your statement about having the rest of your life ahead of you. I feel that to be true, and moreover it is true of my kids. It makes me sad in some ways (the idea that they will experience a lot of turmoil), but I don't think it saddens me as much as it saddens my mom (their grandma). Perhaps I'm just not as entrenched in the idea that life will always get better. Life is what it is. It is what you make of it. Life is impermanence. Accepting that this is true makes it easier to live happily.
I have a sibling 5 years older than I am, and it's amazing, they're a Boomer and I'm an X'er. We're quite close, but there are fundamental differences in how we think and see the world, how we believe. Their experience has been Onward and Upward, because after all, as a Boomer with tons of influential Boomer friends, how could it be otherwise?
I gave my 82 year old father a runthrough of my wake-up-the-sheeple Powerpoint last weekend. He got it instantly, and it scared the heck out of him. He immediately started thinking who else I ought to give the poresentation to - our family has good left-wing political connections that need to hear the message. My mother isn't all that interested - she understands the concept, but has enough to worry about in her life already, and the timeline is too long for her to get worked up over.
I then gave the same show to my 19 year old niece and her boyfriend. They also got it, and even knew a fair bit about it already. Their reaction was very matter-of-fact. Sort of, "Yes, we know it's going to happen, but when you're our age life is all about change anyway, so what else is new?"
A fascinating set of reactions.
I myself had seen Hubbert curves earlier in life but dismissed them as Chicken Little doomerism. It was only when I accidentally ran across a Matthew Simmons lecture that I realized this guy knows his tech and is not kidding. Went through the usual psych coping mechanisms: denial, anger, bargaining. Still in the bargaining stage and grudgingly sinking into acceptance.

Technology will get us out of the Quicksand!
If that doesn't work, The Market will throw us a Life Line.
It always ends happily. 10,000 movies can't be wrong.
Of course, I was exposed to ideas of Peak Oil over a decade ago, when I worked for the Energy Analysis Program at LBNL. I didn't understand the full consequences then (I just thought in terms of rising gas prices and how they would effect me). So perhaps my situation is somewhat unique.
-best
That said, I am happier now than I have been in a long time. Go figure.
I copied the ASPO graph from the front of their newsletter pasted it into a Word document, and then added three rectangles underneath it. One for my mothers life 1926 - 2010, one for myself 1965 - 2040, and one for my first son 1999 - 2080. I aligned then to the graph and there it is; mum has only ever known growth, I'll know both, and My son probably wont remember growth an only know depletion. I now cut Mum a lot more slack.
I am shooting for 1965-2050.
I am one who has been gathering the knowledge to be dropped anywhere in the USA and be able to survive at least a little while. With just the clothes on my back. Trisha could not due to medical issues.
Teach your kids fun projects. Growing and storing foods found in your yard and surrounding countryside and grown by you. Teach them how to make fire without matches, All the basic old school boy scout things. Teach them to repect the earth and the people that live on it, even if they don't always agree with their dieties or politics. Teach them how to cook new foods and how to eat new foods. Get out of your box and into the world around them.
I thank GOD that my dad taught me to love cooking, and to try foods even if I had not a clue waht were in them. I am living with my parents dad 70, mom 76, and teaching them things I learned out there in the wilds of the world.
I have no childern of my own, neither does my brother, we are the last of my dad's line, His older brother had 2 boys as well and they have 4 kids between them. A zero sum gain on my uncle's side and a negative gain on my dad's side.
Keep talking to your wife and keep having fun, its better to laugh than to cry, though crying is okay, but remember to get back to being positive, even if you feel the world is comeing down around your ears. It's your Character that matters to your kids, and your wife and to others.
Boomers like you told me all about the extensive set of reasons I am only good for sweeping floors etc while H1B's and affirmative-action babies get the training and jobs. And it's all OK with you, because all the Righteous are going to Heaven right? Just like all those little Lebanese babies killed with American bombs, it's all OK cos Gawd sez so. Oh wait, the Lebanese kids didn't get a chance to get Baptized or hear Pat Robertson on the radio or whatever it takes, and they were in the way of Gawd-fearing American imperialism, too bad, they go to hell.
Yeah I know they are main stream and we have to listen to them say stupid things, and have stupid ideas and they taint the rest of us Christians. But I am not one of thier ilk.
And Though I could never get a true answer If I am a boomer or not. I would have never told you :::
<<<Boomers like you told me all about the extensive set of reasons I am only good for sweeping floors etc while H1B's and affirmative-action babies get the training and jobs.>>>
You are good for what you are good at, and its up to you to get there. And along the way If I can help you get to where you are going just ask, I will offer you any help I can.
Everyone is created Equal, no one should be left behind.
I guess in the end , I will be out there helping anyone I can till I can't help anyone else. Just ask former neighbors of mine, > 608 Kennan Rd. Huntsville Alabama, ask them about Charles or some knew as Bear, ask them they can be my witnesses, black or white I treated them all as fellow humans..
Judge me for what I have done, not for what the guy on TV does.
That said, when I explained peak oil to her, she took it very seriously and when we got to EROEI, her eyes got big. I think she gets it but doesn't see what she can do at this point in her life (no assets, not a lot of choices but to decide which kid to move in with), so her response is philosophical.
Tate,
You of course understand you are bucking up against one of the foundational pillars of our Western culture? ... Free Will.
It is built into our Judaeo-Christian view of the world that all human beings are "intelligent" and have powers of "rational" choice.
To suggest that we might be robots --programmable, emotion machines-- why that is heresy.
Do you renounce?
No? Obviously you have learned quite a bit more in college than the average robot, err ... I mean college graduate, comes to understand. This might make you unhappy in future life. Remember the first commandment from the Garden of Eden: "And from the Tree of Knowledge thou shall not eat lest ye know you are naked."
What does it mean to be half "robot", to be programmed by MSM?
I had a money/banking econ theory class and I started asking questions and my econ professor rebuffed my attempts at understanding the concept. He denied it at first and then admitted he saw a lot of benefits if oil hits $100 a barrel. Now I couldn't ask the right questions at the time b/c I still didnt know enough to stand my ground. So listened to my grair haired proff and proceeded to debunk everything he said. I ran out of time, but I will probably be in another one of his classes next semester.
Things have changed. I didnt take any summer courses and instead took a reality course and started learning everything I possibily could about PO, GW, and the dire financial position we've dug ourselves into. I find it very hard now to discuss some issues without interjecting my firm objections to our current way of life.
Last night I got into an "discussion" w/ my Biz writing instuctor over persuasive messages in advertising and of course I put it out there that we are easily influenced and it's pretty clear to see we will do whatever is necessary to consume! Which included absorbing as much debt as possible to keep buying junk. She didn't like that answer, but so what. I can back up my position with facts and if you're too warped to step back and think for yourself I can help you little.
I've always been different, though I'm sure many feel the same. People have told me that from very early and it's just who I am. I'm proud to be different and frequently get into "discussions" over the simple concept of a "normal person" (i believe none exists).
As for "persuasive" writing, let me give you a tip: it's all about understanding "reading" --no, not you understanding how to read but rather you understanding how other people read. You need to be able to pretend you are them and need to see how they decode your words without having first known what you intended.