2009 futures are at $63 - so $35 and $90 in 2009 are of roughly equal probability, (interest and carrying costs not included). If more people thought $90 was more probable, the price would be closer to $90.  Therefore, there are many in the camp that think we might have $35 in 2009. Most of them dont post here however.
To believe that oil would be US$35 in 2009, one must believe that the growth in world oil production over the next 3 years will greatly exceed the growth in US$ M3.  Seeing as M3 is no longer reported, but credibly estimated to be growing at a double digit rate, to expect oil production to grow faster than that is simply amazing.
Would you mind explaining the linkage between M3 and the oil price?
Micro, never thought of it before in that manner.

It would seem to indicate that oil, at US$35 in 2009, would be essentially worthless in the face of a global glut of US dollars.

I still don't get it. If the US prints money, the dollar deflates. This causes the price of oil to go up in dollar terms, not down.

It seems that case for $35 oil is impossible if the US is printing enough money to deflate the dollar relative to the basket of currencies of oil buying countries. This doesn't seem to be happening at this point.

It is true that a weakening dollar could make the dollar price of oil higher in dollars, even if it did not go up in purchasing power terms for other countries.

The original calculation could be modified by using 2009 dollar values from the futures market, but this would probably not have a huge impact. It would also be a bit of a tricky calculation to figure out the basket of currencies that oil prices trade against.

But Jack, you do get it.

The Feds are printing money like reckless thieves, but who knows, they won't tell us any longer how much they are actually printing.

This will certainly devaluate the dollar.

Add in the rate of inflation... and who knows what that really is either. Its either what the feds tell us, or more likely, it really is about 7 percent.

Now, imagine oil selling for half the price than it did several weeks ago, 3 years from now!

2009 futures are at $63 - so $35 and $90 in 2009 are of roughly equal probability

Right, and actually if you look at option prices (I had to go to 2010 because it is more liquid, being a round number) the prices of $35 and $90 options imply about a 20% chance that the contract price will be outside that range - either less than $35 or more than $90.

I'm sure many people here don't find that too surprising; they're probably all sure that the price will be over $90. But the smart money says that below $35 is equally likely as over $90 - about 10% in each case.

what i think is more likely is that demand outstrips supply in the next 18 months, causes spike above $90, and the ensuing economic dominoes collapse world economy leading to supply (at that near peak point) far outstripping demand, and the marginal barrel heads below $35. volatility will be extreme and as Ive discussed previously, volatility itself can be worse of an enemy than expensive oil
So you think that since we may fall a tad short in the near term, the entire economic system worldwide will collapse?  It takes a LOT longer then 18 months for something like that to happen.  Just look at the 70's~
Halfin, I'm on track with you much of the time, but pedantic soul that I am, I must remind readers that it isn't "smart money" that says.  It is the past statistical pattern, which if countinued, will produce prices with an 80% probability of beinf within $35 and $90.

Our best guess is that the pattern will continue, but we cannot predict the chance that the pattern will be broken.

Again, the 20% outside, is the chance given the past pattern.