your re-framing the argument.
the kyoto protocol and the power-down protocol are technically a treaties but they requires all country's sign on and agree to what it says.
a normal treaty is only between a small handful of country's, this treaty has one thing kyoto and and what a peaceful power-down lack. the counter weight that there will be immediate consequences if the treaty is broken by either a governing body like the U.N. or the neighboring country's to the ones who signed the treaty.
You're wrong.  The Kyoto Protocol required a mininum number of signators- 55 representing at least 55% of 1990 CO2 emission, and this was achieved when Russia signed on.  It has the force of international law, for those signatories.
In this respect it is like other international treaties, such as for example the treaty banning the production and use of landmines.

In August of 2006, 165 nations were signatories to the Kyoto Protocol.

The USA keeps turning up on the list of non-signatories to international treaties aimed at improving the lot of humanity.  This appears to be linked to a special dispensation from God. Or perhaps a pact with Satan.
 

OK so i was wrong on the numbers, but that doesn't kill my point.
tell me what punitive measures the current signature nations are doing to punish the nations that do not sign on if they truly do care about this planet?
economic sanctions?
withdrawing any and all diplomatic ties?
military action?
the future of our plant is at stake and playing politics wont help. each nation not signing makes it harder for the rest if not impossible.