![]() | The Tragic Consequences of the High Discounting of Oil Extraction | The Oil Drum | Fuel Prices As We Go over the Top...? | ![]() |
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- The 2008 IEA WEO - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
As far as the oil supply is concerned, the world bubbles over with optimism.
During the day I usually keep the TV on CNBC. Listening, day after day, to the analysts and commentators, optimism absolutely abounds where the oil supply is concerned. No one believes the OPEC cuts will make one whit of difference. As the talking heads come and go, they all have the very same message: "There is plenty of supply out there." Don't worry, be happy, all is well in the oil patch.
I have heard not a single comment about what effect high prices are having on world consumption. No one mentions the fact that average oil production in 2006 averages about 119 million barrels per day below 2005 production for both crude + condensate as well as all liquids.
All this wild optimism leaves me puzzled. It seems to be like a meme, a contagious idea that has infected the mind of almost everyone in the investment world. And I keep wondering; how long before this meme leads them to disaster.
Ron Patterson
It should have read 119 thousand barrels per day below 2005 production.
Sorry for the brain lapse.
Ron Patterson
Seriously, I don't think this is so much of a meme as a good example of groupthink. But the infinite growth idea, now that is definitely a meme.
You really hit the nail on the head there Ron. This is irrational exuberance at its most extreme and it certainly is contagious. The level of complacency out there now is absolutely staggering, as that level of manic optimism makes people fearless - it makes them discount, or ignore entirely, the obvious risks they are facing. However, a consensus that extreme is ususally indicative of a trend reaching exhaustion. If everyone is bullish and has acted (ie placed their bets) accordingly, who is there left to buy into the upward trend in order to sustain it?
When the greatest speculative fool has already committed himself, then the trend will reverse, and will probably do so sharply. As the reversal picks up speed (as it will because fear is a much sharper emotion than hope or greed and therefore spreads much more quickly), the downturn will begin to feed on itself just as the upswing has done. IMO we are very close to the point of reversal, although the prevailing optimism makes such a forecast seem incredible at this point.
Two months before result announcements the CFO left, everyone thought he was stupid. It looked like he was not because the global situation started to decline afterwards.
Then two days before, an optimist CEO told us that everything was fine and he was still expecting a soon and substantial increase of share value.
The people at the office all believed him, even ten days later when the stock felt 50%, most of them were still believing, only when it felt to less than 1% after a very short period of time, people started to understand...
Hopefully I was working out of the office and somehow protected from the illness, so I sold my stock options before they valued nothing.
Eventhough, I was still a bit confused because I bought some share at 50 cents (from 80$ high) hoping to make a good deal! I lost everything of course.
This is a good sample of mental blindness caused by your environment. This time, everything from family, work, hobbies to MSM is causing this blindness, it will be very difficult to escape the crash.
Many thanks to TOD and others to help us.
I dunno, maybe there's worse.....not by much.
This plateau continues to impact those at the very lowest economic levels in ways not apparent. Who can blame Darfur or Iraq on declining discoveries? Who can blame global warming on this same pre-peak irrational exhuberance?
As the old firesign Theater used to say,
Don't panic, Don't take off your shoes !
At the end of each of these feeds they have a little "lighter side" type story that's supposed to get you all feelin' good before you encounter the rush hour hell...
Well today's funny story was about (paraphrasing) - Motor Trend's SUV of the year goes to Mercedes Benz GL450 - it may be a gas guzzler V-8 but it'll get you around in style blah blah blah with 335 horsies etc etc...
All that got out of me was nervous laughter - not quite the gee whiz chuckle and Neanderthal drooling of their target audience I suppose...
Oh by the way - if you're looking for one they're only about $55k
Ron Patterson
My subtle reference was to the 3 Strike Groups currently cruising around (wasting our tax dollars) the Persian Gulf.
US naval war games off the Iranian coastline: A provocation which could lead to War?
by Michel Chossudovsky
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20061024&articleId=3593
There is a massive concentration of US naval power in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Three US naval strike groups off the Iranian coastline are deployed: USS Enterprise, USS Eisenhower and USS Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group.
The naval strike groups have been assigned to fighting the "global war on terrorism."
Tehran considers the US war games to be conducted in the Persian Gulf, off the Iranian coastline as a provocation, which is intended to trigger a potential crisis and a situation of direct confrontation between US and Iranian naval forces in the Persian Gulf:
"Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.
Iran's official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed foreign ministry official as describing the military manoeuvres as dangerous and suspicious.
Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.
The Iranian foreign ministry official said the US-led exercises were not in line with the security and stability of the region. Instead, they are aimed at fomenting crises, he said." (quoted in BBC, 23 October 2006)
Also...this morning:
N. Korea threatens war if South joins sanctions
Pyongyang issued similar threat before this month's nuclear test
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15411541/