64 comments on Investment in Oil Exploration and Production -- An "Above Ground" Factor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
64 comments on Investment in Oil Exploration and Production -- An "Above Ground" Factor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- The First Wave Energy Farm of the World...It's About Time...
- Some Lessons from Bailout Month
- UK House Sellers In Denial About The Property Crisis - Energy Too?
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.







GAIA Host Collective
I'm a bit confused by this statement. Over a 5 year span, a 70% increase to $340 billion means that we invested only $200 billion in 2000. Assuming a 5% inflation rate for the industry, I come up with this:
2000 = $200.0
2001 = $210.0
2002 = $220.5
2003 = $231.5
2004 = $243.1
2005 = $255.3
340 / 255.3 = 33% increase
In order for this statement to be correct, and net investment to only increase by 5%, the global inflation rate would have to be at a rate that increases investment to $324 billion. This rate would have to be around 10%.
Does anyone here really think the global oil industry inflation rate is 10% annually? That would make it something like 2.5x the global inflation rate.
Scarity has bid up a limited supply (in some cases dramatically) and even the raw materials used (steel & oil products are two largest) have gone up substantially.
Alan
How to calculate a percentage of increase using simple mathematics.
A = Last measurement
B = increase
C = Percent of increase
A-B/A = C
(A-B/A)*A = C*A
A-B = C*A
-B = C*A-A
If we replace with actual numbers we get
-B = 0.70 * 340 - 340
-B = -102
B = 102
That's the increase of 70% in 5 years. Starting year would then be 340-102 = $238 billion. Using that REAL starting number, see what we get with an increase of 5% each year.
2000 = 238
2001 = 249.9
2002 = 262.4
2003 = 275.5
2004 = 289.27
2005 = 303.73
Well, that wasnt enough. What about 7%, lets see :
2000 = 238
2001 = 254.66
2002 = 272.49
2003 = 297.20
2004 = 318
2005 = 340
Actual yearly increase should have been 7%, that pretty near real inflation rate as stated by shadowstatistic web site.
If you make an argument about some calculation (any) be sure to have enough mathematical literacy.
I had a physics teacher that was always saying that before pointing at the straw in the eye of others, someone should first notice the wooden beam that's in his.
In some sectors, Personnel rates have almost doubled.
Rig rates have never been higher.
This significantly impacts on Operator costs and an operators ability to get things done even with the higher Capex for Exp. and Appraisal drilling.
Simmons's presentations of late keep coming back to this issue.