154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
- Leading the Way to a Low-Energy Future
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
- From Counterculture To Cyberculture: The Life And Times Of Stewart Brand
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Sorry, but what?
My understanding is that the nominal case is production takes a time to reach a value, maintains a rough plateau for a while, then declines at a rate determined by geology as much as economics.
Is the XLS file around anywhere so that we can see what would happen with more appropriate shapes?
And on a related matter, the megaprojects data is all very well, but by the nature of planning cycles you wouldn't necessarily expect to have any data on new megaprojects past the 2012 timeframe as yet. To me that puts a big hole in predictions of 2011+ timeframes - which is just where we would need good data to access decline rates. How can that data be found?
It used to be that you would bring the first well into production and then drill step out wells, develop better understanding of the field and then bring additional wells into production so that the production profile showed a gradual increment toward a peak for that field.
It is current common practice to assess the field and establish an overall production strategy for the entire field and then drill all the required wells so that peak production is achieved much earlier in the life of the field.
The assumptions made by ACE are not necessarily incorrect.
Agreed, but it still takes time to drill those wells - they don't appear overnight. That's particularly true of a larger field (eg megaprojects). We are talking a minimum of 1-2 years to reach that plateau stage.
Compare the shape of these graphs with those others have provided for forecast production and you can see the impact the assumptions have on available production at any date. In essence its a convolution of "field coming onstream" events with curves for expected production volumes. Different convolved shapes will have a cumulative impact on total volume (eg not getting it right is a systematic rather than random error).