154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae bailout: Guess Who Wins
- UK Energy Flow Chart 2007
- Brown pretends to be tough on Russia
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
"There are some Gas To Liquids projects coming on line, and there some Coal To Liquids possibilities, but all of these are high cost, generally low production rate projects. IMO, they will serve to slow, but not reverse the decline in aggregate oil production."
This is an inaccurate statement. In fact, the projects coming online from these sources are very significant - and if oil stays at $60 per barrel you should expect more to follow. Here are two projects due in the next couple of years just from SA ALONE that add up to 560k per day:
Saudi Arabia Khursaniyah Gas New development 2007 250 bpd
Saudi Arabia Hawiyah New development 2008 310 bpd
So, we only need about 30 Khursaniya projects to meet the net decline over five years at 2% per annum decline rate. And again, net exports are falling much faster than overall production is falling.
A couple of points.
You are only talking about accelerating our rate of extraction of finite fossil fuels, in a desperate attempt to keep the supply of Liquid Transportation Fuels (LTF's) stable to growing. Fossil fuels can be viewed as a continuum, from natural gas to natural gas liquids, to condensate, to light/sweet crude, to heavy/sour crude, to bitumen, to coal. We can get LTF's from the endpoints, but the capital and energy costs goes up significantly, and again, all we are talking about doing is accelerating our rate of extraction of fossil fuel supplies.
In regard to Natural Gas, there have been several articles suggesting that world gas supplies are overestimated, and the US case history doesn't offer much support. Our all time record high natural gas production was three years after oil peaked. In any case, Saudi Arabia has already started curtailing some projects because of a lack of natural gas supplies.
"So, we only need about 30 Khursaniya projects to meet the net decline over five years at 2% per annum decline rate. And again, net exports are falling much faster than overall production is falling."
I disagree. There will 1000's of projects over the next five years. Some big, some small. Some oil, some ethanol. Etc etc. To say that "we need 30 Khursaniya"s may sound good for alarmists - but IMO it's not really looking at the bigger picture objectively.
I agree with you on the extraction of finite fossil fuels and that this will at some point peak. I just disagree with the timing.
Ethanol?
"