154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
154 comments on World Crude Oil Production Forecast using Current Fields and Future Megaprojects
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
So, we only need about 30 Khursaniya projects to meet the net decline over five years at 2% per annum decline rate. And again, net exports are falling much faster than overall production is falling.
A couple of points.
You are only talking about accelerating our rate of extraction of finite fossil fuels, in a desperate attempt to keep the supply of Liquid Transportation Fuels (LTF's) stable to growing. Fossil fuels can be viewed as a continuum, from natural gas to natural gas liquids, to condensate, to light/sweet crude, to heavy/sour crude, to bitumen, to coal. We can get LTF's from the endpoints, but the capital and energy costs goes up significantly, and again, all we are talking about doing is accelerating our rate of extraction of fossil fuel supplies.
In regard to Natural Gas, there have been several articles suggesting that world gas supplies are overestimated, and the US case history doesn't offer much support. Our all time record high natural gas production was three years after oil peaked. In any case, Saudi Arabia has already started curtailing some projects because of a lack of natural gas supplies.
"So, we only need about 30 Khursaniya projects to meet the net decline over five years at 2% per annum decline rate. And again, net exports are falling much faster than overall production is falling."
I disagree. There will 1000's of projects over the next five years. Some big, some small. Some oil, some ethanol. Etc etc. To say that "we need 30 Khursaniya"s may sound good for alarmists - but IMO it's not really looking at the bigger picture objectively.
I agree with you on the extraction of finite fossil fuels and that this will at some point peak. I just disagree with the timing.
Ethanol?
"