Yes. A screaming sign of deathly conservatism, a defense of an old state of affairs, in function both of some, but only some, corporate and business interests (these in turn being shaped by Gvmt. policy in return for what are basically bribes) and a championing of ancestral ‘core’ values - the right to act as if land use, energy, success and opportunity can never be limited materially or socially changed, even if, today, such myths don’t have the expected effects (eg. social mobility in every old EU country is higher than in the US, poverty in highest in the US amongst developed countries, etc. ...)

It is really quite surprising that the US has turned out be a bastion of conservatism, inflexibility, rampant bureaucracy and ‘big state’ (not in aid paid to the poor), military domination, a kind of war economy - in view of its reputation of pragmatism, inventivity, hard work, egalitarianism, a can-do attitUde.

Not that the EU (Japan, Aus, etc.) is any better, but the US, as an emanation of it, and as the supposed ‘hegemon’ is on the front line both for action (Iraq invasion) and criticism.

IMO the main problem is not so much conservatism but rather what some call "demosclerosis." Few constructive plans can get through our the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate, because the veto groups acting on behalf of vested interests are too strong, and what we've had for decades is worsening gridlock. Complicating demosclerosis are the short-sightedness of politicians (dominated by concerns of the upcoming election) and the rational ignorance of voters (rational because one vote is unlikely to affect the outcome of an election).

When republics fail there is usually a Caesar waiting in the wings.