The SH lynching show was timed to coincide precisely with the time that USA passes through the 3 egg shells territory.

Yup folk.
3,000 American troops dead and hardly any notice given to that story.

Why?
Because explicit photos of the SH lynching dominate the MSM stream of consciousness.

You've been played yet again.
Did you notice?

Don't bahhh-there.
The Good Shepherd always leads his flock in the right direction, in the new way forward.

Think my conspiracy oriented ways are worthy of ridicule?

Well how about the New York Times? Are they also stupid for seeing that something was "rushed" in a highly unusual way?

P.P.S.

Sorry folk for the morbid topic on this joyous passage into a "new" year with all "new" techniques for re-painting history.

This quote was too insightful to let pass by:

In this light, it seems that the initial coverage of Saddam's execution has served as a collective ritual hand-washing designed to reassure Americans that they really are the blameless leaders of a cosmic struggle against "evil." And so the answer to the existential question comes into view. Today's mainstream journalism, even "live" TV, is a far cry from the first draft of history. Instead, it functions largely as a transmission of selective history that has been drafted--and airbrushed, and sanitized, and rearranged, and distorted--long before it ever reaches our eyes and ears.

--from CNN and the New York Times Execute a Denial of History