A serious collapse, doomer scenario, or fast decline will hurt the oil companies. A slow squeeze will be very lucrative. I believe we are in for a slow squeeze. What I believe will happen is sort of like post-Katrina in slow motion. People will hate the oil companies more than they do now for profiting while they are paying through the teeth for gasoline. The politicians will enact more and more taxes. But none of that will do anything to increase oil supplies.

Seriously, a major reason I came to work for an oil company was that I considered the position they would be in post-peak. I think post-peak, an oil company is not a bad place to be (barring a significant collapse). I once thought that post-peak oil companies would just be out of business, but the more I started thinking about it, the more I came to believe that they would be printing money as oil supplies dwindle (or as demand starts to outstrip supplies).

Thank you. A very thoughtful and reasonable response in the first paragraph and good thinking in the second.

So you do not see, at no point in decline under a "slow squeeze" time frame, any intra-national energy and food distribution problems? I'm talking mostly about the First Worlders like N.A., euroland, S.A. or parts of asia...??

At no point in the oil decline curve will their be a USSR-like breakdown and subsequent bickering between states for any major first world countries?

Robert, one of the issues though in the slow squeeze scenario is not just production, but distribution. Look at Venezuela right now. When things turn sour, how many more nations will nationalize their oil companies? My primary impression is one of a slow squeeze also, at least for the first decade or so. But rising population and declining production is going to make that very ugly very fast. Can we count on enough non-US oil being available to us?

To me, the decline from peak starts to play wildcards, like rate of nationalization and confiscation of oil companies and resources, resource wars, etc. And none of those are predictable. We can look at the declining rate of production and say all other things being equal that oil companies are a good bet, but will all other things remain equal? That, to me, is the unknown.

By the way, I am arranging my own immediate affairs as if other things will remain roughly equal. Why? Because if they do not we get into areas like martial law, nationalization, national emergencies, rationing, etc., and there is no real way to invest against that. I view survival preparations as insurance against such unknowns so they do not take up all of my investments but only a fraction, though that fraction may grow over time if I believe the situation is worsening faster than I expected.

In short, I think your hunch is right, at least for the first few years post-peak. I also think that confiscation is inevitable as the situation deteriorates, barring some technological breakthrough. The question there is simplty when?

Agree 100% :)

By to hold for 5-10 years and you will make a killing.

Even if we get rid of the personal car and replace it we still need a lot of oil to run heavy equipment airplanes etc etc etc. We will basically run this stuff on oil with electric making a slow replacement where possible.

The point is even if we do the right thing about peak oil and change we will still use all the available oil. This is a given. In later years it will be used where it makes sense but it will be used.

To reply to my own post :)

I say at 10 dollars a gallon for gasoline we max out on fuel cost because at 10 buck a gallon any energy source is reasonable. So at ten buck a gallon we can afford to pump all the remaining oil thus we will.

10 dollars a gallon in todays money is really the max or true price for energy above this it makes sense to conserve energy uses or minimize so it will never get over ten.

Brutal for the American crap lifestyle but if your a doomer it does show that their is a upper bound and its really not that high. England is at 7 dollars a gallon now as well as a lot of Europe so they are not far from having a economy that is peak oil insensitive.

Might as well keep talking to myself :)

I read this

http://www.forbes.com/guruinsights/2007/01/10/recession-commodities-hous...

Pretty doom and gloom but he is postulating that oil prices will drop while we
say they will go up if we are at peak. So for all those happy people out their consider his scenarios with rising oil prices or worse of course my prediction of volatile prices with spikes.

I'm just saying the the psychological consequences on the group mind with everything going down and oil prices rising will not be pretty.

At the end of the day the effects of peak oil are psychological.

It's tough to even talk to an investment advisor about the economic future, if one believes that we will have a shrinking economic pie. The standard investment mantra holds that over the 'long term' a portfolio that is properly diversified will alway grow. In the coming energy starved world this very well may not be so, but try telling an investment person that. It may be more sensible to do the now verboten thing of making carefully targeted investments, rather than broadly diversified ones. In any case, I expect the next 5 - 10 years to be so volatile that no strategy will actually be reliably predictable.