![]() | The Round-Up: February 9th 2007 | The Oil Drum: Canada | Anaerobic Digestion (AD) in Ontario – A Regulatory Obstacle Course | ![]() |
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
The BC government's throne speech yesterday contains a deep commitment to reducing emissions. Here are some highlights from the press release:
I keep track of these things and think that a 33% reduction from 2004 emissions (the most recent year publicly available) would place BC exactly at the 1990 level but it's a very creditable policy effort.
On Monday, Stephen Harper announced that Canada will allocate $1.5 billion to "co-fund with the provinces technology development, energy efficiency and other major projects that will provide real results on the reduction of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions".
Two new coal-fired generating stations were announced recently, one in Princeton and the other for Tumbler Ridge. The provincial NDP were claiming a victory this morning, saying that the zero net emissions goal meant both projects would be cancelled. Did they miss this point, or do they think BC Hydro can't do it?
This is a mind-boggling action plan with a lot to admire. Here's hoping that most of it will get implemented.
Would you like to guest post this porsena? It deserves more attention than it will get here in the comments. I'd be happy to format it as a post attributed to you if you'd like.
OK, thanks. Here's a link to the press release.
The 'shopping list' looks great, but most of it has either already been achieved or implemented under other programs.
For instance...
The Hydrogen Highway developments are nothing new.
Closure of beehive burners will be painless since the actual mills are being shut down with them.
The MPB infestation is a huge problem that must be addressed irrespective of any climate change action due to the nature of the fire hazard that 13 million hectares of dead wood presents and there's a number of initiatives planned under the Ministry of Forests for that.
BC hydro already has a CFL and fridge rebate program in place and smart metering is coming regardless but not for the environmental reasons one would think they were =]
Meanwhile, +80% of the province's electricity already comes from renewable resources giving it one of the lowest GHG/GW emissions profiles on the continent - so again, nothing new here.
The Innovative Clean Energy Fund, however, is new and that may likely fall under the jurisdiction of the newly formed Bioenergy Strategy Branch and although there's no mention of it in the speech, a renewable fuel componnent (similar to the one adopted by Ottawa) may be forthcoming =]
All in all... BC remains one of the most forward thinking regions in regards to environmental issues and although some projects like the Hydrogen Highway are nothing more than a political sideshow, I certainly applaud the province for sticking it's neck out on other green initiatives that at first glance may be the more expensive or problematic solution - the trolley bus system in Vancouver being a good example.
That said, what else would one expect from the founding home of Greenpeace.
although there's no mention of it in the speech, a renewable fuel componnent (similar to the one adopted by Ottawa) may be forthcoming =]
The full text of the speech has this hint: "British Columbia will establish a low-carbon fuel standard. It will reduce the carbon intensity of all passenger vehicles by at least 10 per cent by 2020."
What I think I like most about BC's plan is that it took up about a quarter of the throne speech. That's a signal change in attitude.
Yup I agree.