<Energy's Role in Europe's Trade Deficits The Oil Drum DrumBeat: March 2, 2007>

301 comments on Is Nuclear Power a Viable Option for Our Energy Needs?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

PaulS on March 1, 2007 - 2:45pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Just on account of geography, I don't understand where we could possibly put the vast quantity of pumped storage that would be needed to sustain the USA during a relatively windless July when the unmoving high just parks and sits over much of the country, as happens every now and then. And that's before we even consider the vast powers we've foolishly ceded to the small handful of NIMBY and BANANA Luddites, who have been blocking wind power along with every other conceivable power source.

It seems inconceivable that this could work on a scale large enough to make a substantial dent in overall energy supply.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
AlanfromBigEasy on March 1, 2007 - 10:15pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Cheapest solution is to manage Great Lakes within natural ranges and lower them during calm spell (as well as Lake Winnipeg, build out 5 more GW of hydro in Manitoba). Also drain reserviors on Columbia River, etc.

Geothermal could be made into peaking & emergency power rather than baseload. Drill 4x more wells, add turbines and use resource 25% of the time, including during calms.

I can easily design limited pumped storage that can run for one month. Long tunnel with several thousand feet differential. Large upper reservior.

No high/calm hits the entire continent. Perhaps a majority of population but not majority of land area. Sea breezes peak in summer for example and there is no stopping them.

More in my incomplete plans (53% wind, 23% nuke, 20% hydro, -19% & +15% pumped storage, etc. when I post them here.

Best Hopes,

Alan

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Valuethinker on March 2, 2007 - 9:57am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Ontario is looking at using disused mines.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
atomicrod on March 10, 2007 - 3:38am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Alan:

As a native Floridian, I wonder where you plan to find a "several thousand feet differential" in my home state? (The highest point in the whole state - which had a population of nearly 16 Million people in 2000 - is less than 400 feet above sea level.)

I also wonder how the people who live and work on the Great Lakes feel about your plans to make their levels fluctuate even more than they do currently.

Rod Adams
Editor, Atomic Insights

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

301 comments on Is Nuclear Power a Viable Option for Our Energy Needs?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version