![]() | Cooking Oil to Biodiesel Programs in NYC | The Oil Drum: Local | The Case for Physically Separated Bike Lanes | ![]() |
81 comments on Addicted to Oil and Drunk on Ethanol
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
81 comments on Addicted to Oil and Drunk on Ethanol
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search
Blogroll
NY Blogs
- Gothamist
- Starts & Fits
- Aaron Naparstek
- Baloghblog
- One Atlantic
- bikeblog
- Curbed
- Urban Digs
- OnNYTurf
- Daily Gotham
- StreetsBlog
Local Organizations
- NYC Peak Oil Meet-up
- Peak Oil NYC
- Transportation Alternatives
- Time's Up
- Straphanger's Campaign
- Regional Plan Association
- Green Homes NYC
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign
- Harbor Rail Tunnel
- Auto Free NY
- Walk NY
- Bridge Tolls Advocacy
- Vision 42nd Street
- Car Free
- Right of Way
- Upper Green Side
Local Media
National Peak Oil Sites
Webrings
|
|
|
|
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
The Oil Drum: New York City archives
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Oh god not this again.
If I've said it once I've said it a million times.
Ethanol isn't a fuel policy its a farm subsidy policy.
It makes plenty sense to effectively strip the sugars from corn production to make ethanol when you're left with the protein feed for livestock.
And since the bulk of all corn produced in the US was (historically) used for livestock feed it made sense to "skim off" the ethanol. The effective energy return is much higher because the farming "system" as a whole doesn't use any extra energy, and for the cost of a little Nat Gas (at the distillery) you get a bit of ethanol which could be used locally as an oxygenate in farm state fuel.
What doesn't make any sense is to mandate that the US makes trillions of gallons of the stuff at any cost to blend into gasoline regardless of the cost. That would be silly.
But then silly never stopped US legislators before.....
Andy
"Mama don't take my Post Toasties away"
Sounds kind of corny but we certainly do have a dilemma on our hands. FOOD VS FUEL
"and you can't have one without the other" .....as in love and marriage.
A big thank you to all who contribute to TOD for your time and effort. I am a follower of TOD on a daily basis.........it is a sort of guiding light.
I'm a believer
R Jerome from Phoenix
when you're left with the protein feed for livestock.
Don't forget you can get a fungal bloom and the release of sprouting inhibitors if you use the DDG and a herbicide.
http://www.communitysolution.org/04conf/af1.html
So the dry distillers' grains is a pre-emergent herbicide, in other words it stops weed seeds from sprouting. As soon as they sprout, they die. That's because what I've done by putting this stuff in the soil is I've fed seed-eating fungi and bacteria.
Andy,
So if there's plenty of corn product left after stripping out the alcohol, then why are the livestock feeders freaking out about the shortage of corn?
Why has the price of feed even gone up for them?
Corn gluten is a poor food additive for cattle. Perhaps it can be useful for poultry in small quantities, but the price of DDG has gone down since the rise of ethanol. Perhaps McDonald's will invent a burger-like substance from DDGs which can be deep fried, sweetened and salted, then sold to obese human beings.
As a midwestern pork producer faced head on with a doubling of corn price in six months, I can tell you that there will be reduced meat protein in grocery stores. One 56# bushel of corn yeilds 17# of dry distillers grains. Pigs and chickens can effectively utilize small quantities of DDGS in the diet (about 10-20%). Beef can and are using 40-50%, and can theoretically utilize 100%. before the ethanol boom DDGS delivered was about $200/ton, today it's about $140. Another consideration is the plants eventual use of distillers grain to fuel the plant.
http://www.physorg.com/news78508751.html
A plants distillers grains will supposedly supply >100% of it's energy needs.
I've heard the economics of this are favorable, perhaps someone knows more about this than I.
You're not the only one to figure out the ag-subsidy angle.
The problem with your analysis is that, at 51¢/gallon subsidy and an EROEI of 1.3 at best (and perhaps as low as RR's calculated 1.09), each gallon-equivalent of new energy is receiving at least $2.21 (1.3:1) and possibly as much as $6.18 (1.09:1) in subsidy.
There are a lot of ways to save petroleum at far lower cost than even the lowest estimate. Ethanol subsidies are money down a rathole.
1.3 * ethanol in = ethanol out
1.3 * 3.33 = 4.33
and observe that ethanol out - ethanol in = 1
If 4.33 gallons are produced and there are no other energy inputs or outputs, 3.33 gallons is used to produce the ethanol and only 1 gallon is aviable for something useful. I assume that some of the wasteproducts could be used to something useful but this must be really bad anyway.