100 comments on Why We Disagree on Peak Oil and Climate Change: Part III - Our Belief Systems
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
100 comments on Why We Disagree on Peak Oil and Climate Change: Part III - Our Belief Systems
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- UK Energy Flow Chart 2007
- Brown pretends to be tough on Russia
- Russian gas and European energy security - a reprise
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
jbunt
Humans are indeed complex, and many time present a conflicting paradox. For example (based upon 40 years of annecdotal observation of people who have an actual monetary stake in the event), if interest rates are rising sufficiently to say that a trend is in place, then the majority will see that trent continuing, no matter how high they get. Only when the trend turns down, will the majority believe that interest rates are going lower, a belief that the majority will hold until the trend reverses back up.
On the other hand, standing at the roullette wheel in Las Vegas, if red comes up 10 times in a row, the majority, if forced to bet, will bet on black "because red cannot keep comming up."
With respect to the two examples, for some reason people seem to follow the first one. People go to the gas station and there is always gas there. So, there is no shortage of oil, end of discussion. If the price is going up, it is the greedy bastards at the oil companies that are at fault. I view it as kind of the "draining bathtub." Assume that you are living in a world in which you were living under a giant bathtub drain, and you got your water by turning a valve causing water to come out. You had no way of measuring the size of the bathtub. For 100 years, everytime you turned the valve, the water you needed came out. But, people who had skills that you knew nothing about claimed that the tub was being emptied and not refilled and would shortly run out. But, such things had been said in the past and been proven wrong, and even now there was a vast disagreement among such experts. Well, a majority of humans would probably not listen to such arguments. They do not reject them as such, since they do not understand what the experts do, but it is just too uncomfortable to accept their allegations. In fact, you, and everyone that you know, continues to get all of the water that you are willing to pay for.
In the 70's, to get people to cut back, the government used "the line theory" to get people to believe that there was an actual oil shortage when the Arabs took ownership of the oil feilds from the US major oil companies and instituted an embargo. In Texas, you could get gas only between 6 am and 6 pm. In addition, you could only go on an odd or even day, depending upon your license plate. In addition, you were limited to only 10 gallons. Ergo, long lines. People then thought, gee there must be a shortage, look at the lines. You could put the same restrictions on supermarket shopping, get long lines, and convice people that there is not enough food.
If peak oil is about to occur, or if it has occurred, the majority will not act until they see the "trend" change, i.e., they go to the gas station and cannot get all that they want. If the majority of politicians believed that peak oil was a threat, they could now institute rationing to postpone the event and/or mitigate its effects. But, that is probably political suicide, so the odds are that we will all have to wait until the actual peak oil event forces rationing. And that is when all hell breaks loose.
A while back I saw an article, where 20 people from a wedding party all died when the Toyota pick-up they were riding in went off a cliff. Aside from the logistics of how they managed to fit 20 people in a Toyota pick-up, I thought this was a pretty good analogy for the US. We're all packed in the back of the pick-up coming home from the party and we're letting THEM drive.
You would be surprised (or appalled)at how many people one has to fit into a pickup truck if poor. In Saudi Arabia I remember seeing a small pickup truck driving at high speed next to me. The open back was totally filled with migrant workers so that the front wheels of the truck bounded into the air for long spaces of time. You can also imaging what breaking and steering ability the driver must have had - or the Saudi accident rate.
Anecdotal evidence was that the local record was 57!