100 comments on Why We Disagree on Peak Oil and Climate Change: Part III - Our Belief Systems
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
100 comments on Why We Disagree on Peak Oil and Climate Change: Part III - Our Belief Systems
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…”
—Winston Churchill, November 1936
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- UK Energy Flow Chart 2007
- Brown pretends to be tough on Russia
- Russian gas and European energy security - a reprise
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
Interesting article Nate.
Personally i heard of PO in august 2004, when i sat in my car listening to a radiointervju with Professor Kjell Aleklett, where he said that GW would not be a problem due to hydrocarbons because they were running out.
Immideatly when i came home, i GOOGLED ASPO, and surfed to other PO links. I had no problems to grasp the facts and had no initial denial behaviour. Then i have followed the subject daily since then, and i also started personal PO preps that 2004 fall.
By what i have read here in TOD and other places, i am convinced that PO is NOW.
What is very weird, is that it seems that i am very lonely in this belief of PO. Relatives that i talk to do not believe me, and propably think that i am some kind of doomer.
It is like living in a paralell universe with other people, it is a somewhat strange feeling. No one i know of is doing any preps, or for that matter has heard of PO(other than from me, whom they seem not to believe), and why should they know of PO, or believe in what i am saying, since there is nothing about it in mainstream media?
Swede, yes, but what is the decline rate? ASPO's latest graphs show oil + gas down 40% by 2050, that is less than 1% a year (coal extraction in 2050 is predicted to be no less than today). The latest meme on climate change calls for 80% reduction in CO2 by 2050 or approx 2% per year. So, climate change will not be mitigated by peak carbon; we need to reduce even faster than declining supplies!
Yes you could be right JN2
But on the other hand, there is some scientists that somewhat dismiss this carbonhydrate burning as a main reason for GW. It could be that 95% of GW is caused by solarheating, cosmic rays and so on. We have had theese climat changes back in history.
Anyway we can not do anything to mitigate the climat change, and pretty much nothing to for example get China to burn less coal.
I think we are doomed to a climatchange and a die-off. The only thing that we can do is to personally prepare as best we can.
Best Kenneth
Hi Swede,
that is also my experience. Peoples inertia is just staggering. I also daily try to convince smokers to stop smoking: success rate may be 20-30%. Mostly they stop if it is already to late i.e. lung cancer, larynx cancer, etc. It is puzzling but seems to be related to the i.q..
But concerning PO also very bright persons don`t seem to "get it".
Well, I guess I will continue to prepare though I haven`t done much yet besides self defense, gaining knowlegde, driving a SMART car and simplifying my life in general.
Best regards J. Daehn