217 comments on The Status of North Ghawar
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
217 comments on The Status of North Ghawar
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Hello TODers,
Great work by all!
I refer everyone to Garyp's great find:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00473.x
"Houston we have a major problem with Uthmaniyah"
I think we need more information on the moving mud wave in the pressurized waterfront [in all areas of Ghawar] as it pertains to horizontal/vertical permeability/porosity ratios--could the mud wave be making the waterfront behave more like a breaking wave than a rising tide through the payzones?
General carbonate reservoirs have greater permeability and porosity as you go from payzone bottom to top. The mudwave is clogging the bottom making it easier for ever increased waterfront vertical permeability through ever more porous payzone toprock. Increased injection pressure maybe making it very hard to keep the mud moving causing a waterfront 'breaking wave action in the reservoir sweep.
Sorry, wish I had more time, but busy today. Please flog this mud wave implication as best as you can--Good luck!
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Bob - I've not forgotten about your question on a tilted contact - but it is a complicated question to answer - which evidently has been discussed by the SPE for 30 odd years - so I'm not sure that I can contribute a huge amount in a short post.
Suffice to say this:
1. Any aquifer (water) pressure gradient across the field related to a tilted contact is unlikely to be significant to the present debate on reservoir depletion. Variations in pressure caused by production and injected water are likely to be over riding.
2. The geological processes responsible for the tilted contact will be very important in understanding the "hydrodynamics of the reservoir" and how it responds to production.
I know this won't help much but the key issues right now are the size of undrained reserves in good quality reservoir in Northern Ghawar.
Hello TODers,
http://www.spe.org/elibinfo/eLibrary_Papers/spe/2006/06EURO/SPE-98847-MS...
-------------------------------
ABSTRACT/details behind paywall =(
Water Production Management Strategy in North Uthmaniyah Area, Saudi Arabia
A water management strategy was initiated in the North Uthmaniyah area of Ghawar field in late 1999. The strategy main objectives are to reduce operating expenses associated with water handling and avoid capital investment required for the expansion of water handling facilities while engendering a more efficient recovery process. The strategy was implemented through four initiatives: operating of high water cut wells on a cyclic basis, conducting rigless water shut-off jobs, drilling horizontal sidetracks of existing vertical completions and drilling wells with partial penetration completions. [There is much more detail in the abstract, please read]
-------------------------------
http://home.entouch.net/dmd/ghawar.htm
Specifically, I refer you to the second graphic of Alexander: http://home.entouch.net/dmd/ghawarwaterfront.JPG
Does the oilwell placement make sense? I expected a more even spacing, or else well concentration along the top of the incline [the eastside injection well pattern just above the bottom tarmat makes sense]. Also, can someone access the graphics and charts in this article [I can't]:
http://www.oilandgasnewsworldwide.com/bkArticlesF.asp?IssueID=115&Sectio...
---------------------------------------------
[Selected excerpts]
Robert Phelps, Richard Black, Harold Triebwasser, Ali Al Shahri and Fahad Al Ajmi of Saudi Aramco discuss ways to integrate data to identify high-stratiform permeability regions in the 'Uthmaniyah area of Saudi Arabia.
A PROJECT was undertaken at Saudi Aramco to develop a quantitative definition of super-K; map this quantitative definition of super-K and compare to other geological and reservoir properties; determine a possible correlation between the data in order to determine what parameters may be influencing super-K events; and use 3D visualisation to review the data to determine if there are trends or similarities in the data.
Using all open-hole flowmeters in the 'Uthmaniyah area, a Fluid Flow Index (FFI) was calculated.
To better understand the quantity of data used in this study it is important to note that there were 1,366 'Uthmaniyah wells analysed.
This represents about $82 million-worth of open-hole logging cost. A total of 799 wells had flowmeters run at a total cost of $16 million, of which 462 wells were open-hole flowmeters.
The majority of these wells had several and some as many as 16 open-hole flowmeters. Since a data point is taken at every 0.3 m interval, measuring both water and oil, this translates into approximately 2.5 million data points that were used in this study.
-----------------------------
But, I want F-F,SS, and Euan, plus interested others to see this MOTHERLODE OF GHAWAR INFO [WARNING 540 page PDF]:
http://pangea.stanford.edu/~jcaers/theses/thesisJoeVoelker.pdf
----------------------------------------------
page 54 -- placement of all wells in Ghawar
page 106-120 --UTHM waterflood detail and super k
The rest of the PDF is extreme detail that I haven't had time to study.
Other links here:
http://pangea.stanford.edu/~jcaers/publications.html
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Well that puts paid to me doing any real work tomorrow.
Can I point to two papers that result from the trawl to find the original paper for the oil and gas ref.
Integration of Data to Identify High-Stratiform Permeability Regions is the original paper, complete with pretty pics.
&
Simulation of Super-k Behavior in Ghawar by a Multi-Million-Cell Parallel Simulator
There are many more illuminating papers via here. These are Aramco's own papers and there are lots of bits of data to ingest.
-----
Edit: And Fractional Flow REALLY needs to comment on this paper:
Equations for Water/Oil Relative Permeability in Saudi Arabian Sandstone Reservoirs
Hello TODers,
When you use the PDF magnifying tool to zoom in on the oil wells on page 54 of the Motherlode link--alot more detail becomes visible.
Does it show OWC at the various stratigraphic levels inside the well, gas condensate output for some, Horizontals & MRC?
What details do the shapes, and colors mean for each extraction well? for each injection well? Is there any way to figure this out?
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Bob, and anyone else looking at the data, I heartly suggest going through the Aramco Journal of Technology. There is much there that informs and provides evidence that can be pieced together.
The page 54 oil well pic doesn't tell me much, the resolution is too low. However there is enough in the JoT articles to give a fairly complete picture I think.
As an example Simulation of Vertical Fractures and Stratiform Permeability of the Ghawar Field provides a figure that answers precisely the question of where the Uthmaniyah map and cross section output we have goes.
Hello Garyp,
Great Job! This area is/has been studied extensively by Aramco because:
From the Motherlode link:
---------------------------------
Moore[55] reported superficial flood front velocities
v = 15 ft=day over an 8 km span
on the Uthmaniyah flood front.
Saudi Aramco (SA), is attempting to resolve observed, massive, unmitigated hydraulic conductivity between injection and production wells separated often by more than 1 km.
The first fundamental fnding: the predominate, repeated waterflood pattern is that of line drive, specifcally under long and thin, rectangular pattern boundaries. Second: Ghawar water injection wells are often inadvertently hydraulically fractured with unpropped fractures [basically, shooting themselves in their own feet!].
We conclude that these conditions exacerbate the problematic super-k condition, that of early water breakthrough. Our hypothesis for the structure of super-k, containing essential discrete fracture network components, naturally leads to a supposition that the two conditions stated above, are conducive to the formation of highly
conductive pathways, consisting of hydraulic fractures at injection wells, connecting to natural discrete fracture systems, culminating in a network that may significantly
affect production well performance, because it resides in a long, thin bounded region, the tight waterflood pattern.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I haven't read everything yet, but Aramco mentions horizontal wells watering out instantly, water over-riding oil, loss of drilling mud, and other anomalies due to widespread DFNs.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?